Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00424)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "adelasie" <adelasie@...> wrote:
>
> Can you prove this or is it just your understanding of a subject that 
> is highly difficult to understand?
> 
Blavatsky herself has written that letters are not verbatim, they are
not written by Master's hand. So, what I have written is, I think,
proven by Blavatsky's own writing.
There are my own other reasons to arrive at conclusions, but as my
statements can be proved by well documented facts, I am not writing
those other reasons.

Best
Anand Gholap


> On 16 Oct 2008 at 19:47, Anand wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Mahatma Letters were not written verbatim. They are HPB's writing of
> > what she understand from Masters' thoughts.
> > But there is real problem here. Blavatsky materialized her own words
> > in the handwriting of the Masters, signed them with Masters' names and
> > then told that they were Mahatma letters. In today's world this would
> > be called as plain forgery.
> > It is like X writing something, imitating Y's handwriting, and signing
> > it as Y.
> > This is actually an offense.
> > Best
> > Anand Gholap
> > 
> >
>