Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00350)

Anand,

In your latest posting, you write in part:

-----------------------------------------------------------
I think, what happened in case of Blavatsky is she IMPERFECTLY 
received Masters thought. Then she put those thoughts in her own
words, materialized those words on paper using occult powers, and sent
them out as letters from Masters.
Blavatsky many times could NOT understand Master's thought, sometimes
PARTIALLY understood, sometimes ENTIRELY MISUNDERSTOOD.
------------------------------------------------------------

Caps added.

Now Anand, I ask you:

WHAT LEADS YOU TO BELIEVE that she IMPERFECTLY received Masters
thought?

How do you know that?  

Again WHAT LEADS YOU TO BELIEVE that many times Blavatsky could NOT
understand Master's thought?

How do you know that?

WHAT LEADS YOU TO BELIEVE that sometimes she ENTIRELY MISUNDERSTOOD 
Master's thought?

Anand, I am not suggesting that she could not have occasionally made 
mistakes or that she could not sometimes have a misunderstanding.

But are you Anand saying that this misunderstanding happened all the 
time or even most of the time when she was transmitting the Masters' 
thoughts?  

And if you are contending that is the case, how do you know that??

********Are you suggesting that Blavatsky was so ill-trained by the 
Masters that she was a totally incompetent person in relaying 
messages or thoughts or teachings from the Masters??**************

And if you are, then please show the evidence, reasoning, etc. that 
lead you to this conclusion?

You must have some concrete examples or specifics that you can give 
that will actually help readers on Theos-talk understand more fully 
what you are contending.  

Moving on.

Are you ALSO saying that it is your belief that Blavatsky 
misunderstood the Masters' TEACHINGS too???

If you believe that Blavatsky misunderstood the Masters' teachings, 
then it seems to me that this means that you somehow have a better 
understanding of the Masters' teachings than HPB herself.

In other words how do you know the REAL teachings of the Masters?

If you say HPB misunderstood this or that teaching of the Masters, 
then how do you know that?  

Are you in communication with the Masters?  I think Morten Sufilight 
thinks he is in some sort of communication with them.....

Anand, maybe you understand what the real teachings of the Masters 
are.  I don't know.  But if you do, tell us what those real teachings 
are and how you have access to them.

Plus if you really believe H.P. Blavatsky was such an unreliable 
transmitter of the Masters' thoughts, messages AND teachings, then 
consider the following:

What does this tell you about the Masters Koot Hoomi and Morya?  What 
does this tell you about their own competence and their training 
methods??

Here I revert to the related subject which is given in greater detail 
in my posting at:

"Anand, what ethics does the Master KH have???????"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/46459

I will simply say in summary of what is already given in that 
posting, that surely both the Masters Koot Hoomi and Morya --- unless 
they were also incompetent --- must have known that H. P. Blavatsky 
OVER MANY YEARS was garbling, miscommunicating and misunderstanding 
their thoughts, messages and teachings.

Surely these two Masters must have known, must have been aware that 
H. P. Blavatsky was not only garbling, miscommunicating and 
misunderstanding their messages to Sinnett but also they must have 
known that Blavatsky was giving out garbled and misunderstood 
teachings in her books.  

Please remember that Madame Blavatsky's public career spans a period 
of some 16 years and she was constantly writing articles and also her 
books.  And A.P. Sinnett's two books THE OCCULT WORLD and ESOTERIC 
BUDDHISM were widely circualated and these two books contained 
voluminous extracts from Koot Hoomi's supposed letters.

Are you saying that the Masters just ignored all of this and allowed 
all this misunderstanding and misunderstood teachings to be spread to 
the four corners of the globe?

What kind of ethics, morality and even "common honesty" does the
Masters Koot Hoomi and Morya have if such are the "facts" as 
suggested by what you have been writing?????

Of course, you will have to tell us what you are actually contending 
and wanting Theos-Talk readers to consider and believe.

And I hope you will spend some time answering these questions and 
dealing with these issues.

If you know something we don't, if you have insights, etc., which you 
can share with us, I'm sure I am not the only Theos-Talk reader who 
wants to hear what you say so that we in turn may have a greater 
understanding.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc