Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00277)

On Oct 1, 2008 6:10 pm ((PDT)) "rybo6" rybo6@usit.net os_jbug wrote:

>
> On Oct 1, 2008, Leon Maurer wrote:
>
>> Soul, as a single unity, is the initial highest frequency phase
>> order triune [ of] electrodynamic field(s)
>
> Leon, is electro-dynamic fields same as electro-magnetic radiation
> ( photons )/fields?

The electro-magnetic radiation you refer to is the measurable fields  
or EM spectrum (from long radio to gamma waves) on the lower  
frequency/energy phase order "physical" level... (4th world down on  
the cosmogenesis chakrafield diagram). <http://members.aol.com/ 
leonmaurer/Chakrafield-spherical-col_3.jpg>

The fields on the ascending higher order "astral," "mental" and  
"spiritual" levels are analogous with the EM fields on our metric  
physical/material level ... In that they contain frequency/energy  
waves of a higher phase order spectrum that can resonate,  
electrodynamically with the lower order fields.

Thus, the holographic memory and construction information (contents  
of consciousness) carried by these fields (as modulated holographic  
wave interference patterns) can transfer from one field to another by  
phase conjugate adaptive resonance.  This is why, at each  
manifestation of the cyclic universe (big bang-bounce on the physical  
level) -- the galaxies, stars and planets surrounding each zero-point  
black hole of their origins, appear in the same location (in  
spherical total space) that they occupied during the previous cycle.

Since everything in the cosmos is holographically constructed and  
analogous at every fractal involved level, and no information can  
ever be lost -- this could account for the often misinterpreted idea  
of resurrection or reincarnation of every zero-point of consciousness  
both macrocosmically and microcosmically.

>
>> surrounding and permeating the entire universe (on the macrocosmic
>> level)
>
> When you say "surround" to mean omni-embracing all other matter and
> bosonic forces, whether observed or alleged to exist, as universe

Yes.  Like all radiant spherical fields surround their (necessary**)  
inner fractal involved fields.  To understand this, one must give up  
the idea that the universe is only the measurable fields and forces  
on the (4th lowest order) physical/material world.  The universe  
actually is like a vast super-sensuous spiritual bubble surrounding  
infinite numbers of inner fractal involved bubbles, within bubbles,  
within bubbles (at descending orders of frequency/energy and density)  
ad infinitum.  Since all these analogous fields of consciousness  
originate at commonly entangled zero-points of absolute space located  
everywhere in metric space -- we can say that they are "coadunate but  
not consubstantial" aspects of a vast hologram -- which replicates  
itself, analogously and correspondingly on every level of descending  
orders of phenomenal reality.

** Necessary, because no (3-d) spherical field can exist, consisting  
of continuously flowing radial (1-d) lines of force -- unless it  
cyclically emanates and centrifugally radiates in the form of a  
Lissajous-type, spiral vortical figure eight curve.  See:
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.jpg  And:  
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/3cyclefield.gif
>
>> -- all fundamental particles are proposed to be spherical standing  
>> waves of total space (rooted in fundamental spin) surrounding a
>> zero-point of pure consciousness.
>
> Leon, Im not clear on what exactly a "pure consciousness" is?

It is the a-priori quality of potential awareness, will, etc. that is  
inherent in every zero-point source of energy fields
>
> Once I'm clear on that, are you saying the "soul" surrounds
> consciousness?
>
>> Thus, even the photon must be conscious on a fundamental root level
>> -- although, without a phenomenally conscious "soul" (or self  
>> awareness).
>
> Ok, so a photon is conscious, yet without a soul, that I think your
> previous stated permiated all of universe, but apparrently does not
> permeate a photon?
>
> Hope this questions are not overbearing for you as I have been to
> your web site and still need clarification.
>
> RYbo
>>
>> Leon Maurer
>>
>>
>> On Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:04 pm ((PDT) "rybo6" rybo6@usit.net os_jbug
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Meera, ok so soul is not a collection of things, so what exactly is
>> it?
>>
>> Is soul consciousness or is soul just a name as it  "it is the is the
>> other name of consciounesss"?
>>
>> So soul is consciousness with a differrent name?
>>
>> Rybo
>> On Sep 29, 2008, at 8:10 AM, Meera wrote:
>>
>>
>> Rybo,
>>
>> It is the body that is the conjunction/conglomeration of all the
>> five elements of Earth, Water, Fire, Air and Space. The soul isnt
>> the conglomeration of anything. In fact it is the other name of
>> Consciousness in Indian context.
>>
>> meera
>>
>>
>> From: WEDconscious@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:WEDconscious@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rybo6
>> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 6:34 PM
>> To: WEDconscious@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [WEDconsc] soul
>>
>>
>> Meera, maybe Indians are refering to an alledged n toroidal electro-
>> magnetic field that emanates from and returns to the body.  See
>> heart math link.
>>
>> http://www.heartmath.org/index.php?
>> option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=51&limit=1&limitstart=3
>>
>> We also have smells that emanate from the body, maybe that, in
>> conjunction with EMR/F is Indian soul.
>>
>> We also have carbon dioxide and water and other molecules that
>> emanate from the body, may it is the conjunction of all of those
>> that is Indian soul.
>>
>> There was a move called Golden Compass where a persons soul was in
>> another animal.
>>
>> If so, did that animal have a soul to begin with and if so, did it
>> reside in the animal or was it in soul of another animal, including
>> any human animal.
>>
>> Rybo
>>
>> .
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2008, at 7:29 AM, Meera wrote:
>>
>> As many of you will be knowing , Soul in Indian Philosophy is
>> something distinct from the body.
>>
>> Meera
>>
>>
>> =



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]