Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00264)

Anand Gholap believes that there is:

------------------------------------------------------------
...a strong possibility that many of the Mahatma Letters were not
having thoughts of the Masters, but were carrying thoughts of
Blavatsky PRETENDING to be thoughts of Masters.
------------------------------------------------------------

So if letters and messages attributed to Master Koot Hoomi
might only contain "thoughts of Blavatsky PRETENDING to be thoughts
of Masters", then I would suggest that this opens the door to other
issues.

I would assume that Anand will admit that H.P. Blavatskyy was a link,
agent,etc. to the Masters Koot Hoomi and Morya.

So if Anand really believes that HPB could PRETEND TO give thoughts
and messages from the Masters when actually these thoughts and
messages were just her own, then what about C.W. Leadbeater and Annie
Besant????

Could they too have been guilty of PRETENDING to relay messages or
teachings, etc. from the Masters which were actually NOT from the
Masters????

As one example, take Annie Besant's words as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------
"And now I have to give you, by command of the King, HIS MESSAGE,
and SOME OF THE MESSAGES of the Lord Maitreya and His great
Brothers. . . what I am saying, as to matter of announcement, is
definitely at the command of the King whom I serve....

Whatever the effect, SINCE HE HAS SAID IT, it is done. . ."
------------------------------------------------------------------

caps added.

Could Mrs. Besant have been PRETENDING to give messages from the
Masters which were NOT from any Master????

And the same for Mr. Leadbeater?

Remember Mme. Blavatsky was the teacher of both Mrs. Besant and Mr.
Leadbeater and it was THROUGH Madame Blavatsky that Mrs. Besant and
Mr. Leadbeater learned of the Masters.

If as Anand apparently believes Mme. Blavatsky could do such
PRETENDING, then what about her students Mrs. Besant and Mr.
Leadbeater???

The above material is offered as food for thought. And I hope that
Anand will take the time and effort to address these issues which
should not be passed over in silence or summarily dismissed with a
few words.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc