Theos-Talk Archives (September 2008 Message tt00385)

I am against the practical application of such a system and I have reasons for that. Reasons that I cannot explain here. 

Every Section has the right to have a seat in the council. Maybe every Section with 5 thousand members could have the right to have one more seat as a result a section with 10 thousand members would have 3 members in the council. The numbers below are non sense.

Erica



--- On Mon, 9/29/08, Anand <AnandGholap@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Anand <AnandGholap@gmail.com>
Subject: Theos-World Re: TS Rule Changes
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, September 29, 2008, 2:12 AM










    
            Greece - 140 members - 1 GC member

India - 13,000 members - 92 GC members

Rest - 17,000 members - 121 GC members

Total GC members - 214



Above system seems even better. As there are 214 members (which is

large enough), Theosophical Society won't be hijacked by whims of few

individuals, as it is happening now.

Best

Anand Gholap



--- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@ ...> wrote:

>

> Every General Secretary represents certain number of members in his

> Section.  Best practice would be this.

> If India has 13000 members, General Secretary of India will carry

> weight of 13000 points. Similarly General Secretary of Greece will

> have weight of 140 points. Every decision should be taken by

> calculating points this way. 

> One may also think that there could be ten or more representatives

> from large Indian section on the General Council. Suppose there are

> ten representatives from India, then each representative will have a

> weight of 13000/ 10 i.e. 1300 points. 

> It won't be proper to concentrate all power of big Indian Section into

> one General Secretary. It will perhaps be better idea if ten or more

> representatives from the Indian Section represent Indian Section in

> the GC.

> Best

> Anand Gholap

> 

> 

> --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, MKR <mkr777@> wrote:

> >

> > It has come to my attention that the GC changed the TS Rules in

> 2006. No one

> > except the GC members know about the change and what the changes

> are. Has

> > anyone heard anything about these changes. The official rules are

> not on any

> > official website.

> > 

> > Apparently, the fact that changes were made in 2006 and the actual

> changes

> > themselves are kept very closely and have not been disclosed to the

> > membership. It makes me wonder if there are any secret rules

within the

> > rules that members are not aware of.

> > 

> > Considering the tight secrecy with which new rule changes were

> developed and

> > the speed with which the implementation is sought, one wonders if

> there is

> > anything going on at the GC level that is top secret like occult

> secrets? It

> > becomes more and more interesting every day.

> > 

> > All this point to one thing and one thing only. Need for full

> transparency.

> > If not with the machinations within GC will wreck the TS as we

know it.

> > 

> > mkr

> > 

> > 

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

> >

>




      

    
    
	
	 
	
	








	


	
	

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]