Theos-Talk Archives (September 2008 Message tt00381)

Every General Secretary represents certain number of members in his
Section.  Best practice would be this.
If India has 13000 members, General Secretary of India will carry
weight of 13000 points. Similarly General Secretary of Greece will
have weight of 140 points. Every decision should be taken by
calculating points this way. 
One may also think that there could be ten or more representatives
from large Indian section on the General Council. Suppose there are
ten representatives from India, then each representative will have a
weight of 13000/ 10 i.e. 1300 points. 
It won't be proper to concentrate all power of big Indian Section into
one General Secretary. It will perhaps be better idea if ten or more
representatives from the Indian Section represent Indian Section in
the GC.
Best
Anand Gholap


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> It has come to my attention that the GC changed the TS Rules in
2006. No one
> except the GC members know about the change and what the changes
are. Has
> anyone heard anything about these changes. The official rules are
not on any
> official website.
> 
> Apparently, the fact that changes were made in 2006 and the actual
changes
> themselves are kept very closely and have not been disclosed to the
> membership. It makes me wonder if there are any secret rules within the
> rules that members are not aware of.
> 
> Considering the tight secrecy with which new rule changes were
developed and
> the speed with which the implementation is sought, one wonders if
there is
> anything going on at the GC level that is top secret like occult
secrets? It
> becomes more and more interesting every day.
> 
> All this point to one thing and one thing only. Need for full
transparency.
> If not with the machinations within GC will wreck the TS as we know it.
> 
> mkr
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>