[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Sep 28, 2008 02:16 PM
by MKR
A friend mentioned some points and I responded. Thought, the response would be of some interest. ===== I do not see any problems in Indian lodges and do not need any fundamentsl changes. One has to go and live and see for oneselves. I have lived there and hence is my first hand view. There is a dynamism in the membership there as compared what I have personally seen in the US, where I have also lived. So, as they say, if it is not broken, don't fix it. India has lot of very able and experienced members who can address and take care of any Indian problems and do not need assistance from outside. The way they have gone about in the election as well as the high secrecy and speed with which such fundamental changes are attempted is wrong. The question is simply why. This no one has answered so far. In matters like this, there should be open discussion for some months before being considered for a decision because I do not think that all wisdom lies in the heads of GC members. If that were the case, TS would not have been setup as a democratic organization with autonomy at all levels. Let us give some credit to the Founders and the Adepts who are behind the TM. Also very interesting is the fact no one from outside India, dared to discuss the issue of drop in membership and low retention rate. Why? No one seems to have an answer to fix it. Are all the rule changes going to fix this problem? I doubt it. Ramadoss [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]