Theos-Talk Archives (September 2008 Message tt00126)

Thank you Murthy 
for the highly interesting link of E.L. Gardner. I can finally have a clear idea of all the confusion brought to the TS, also I can understand know why Krishnamurty rejected the Theosophical Society. Such an accident on it´s early years, must have been a hard one to overcome for the ones that remained.
Truth have its own way and can survive any devastating distortion of the mind.
 
Best Regards
 
Raquel
 
--- El mar, 23/9/08, A M <anandaam@googlemail.com> escribió:

De: A M anandaam@googlemail.com
Asunto: Re: Theos-World theosophy as A Philosophy
Para: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: martes, 23 septiembre, 2008 7:09






We need to distinguish between a) the different expressions of
theosophical teachings and b) distortions of theosophical teachings.

For example when the Mahatma KH states that the life wave on Mars is
in Pralaya and Leadbeater claims to have visited Mars and seen the
martians in their physcical bodies living in garden towns near the
equator where there are plenty of flowers and water etc - is this just
a different expression of theosophical teaching or a distortion?

When Leadbeater claims he has visited on the astral plane the Lord
Maitreya and has his blessing along with instructions from the Master
KH as to the basis and rituals of the setting up a Liberal Catholic
church, yet we find the Master KH's views in the Mahatma Letters on
God and clergy completely contradicting Leadbeaters views - is this
just a different expression of theosophical teaching or a distortion
of theosophical teaching? (see
http://www.theosoph ical.ca/NoReligi on.htm )

Many of Leadbeater's teaching on theosophy come from his astral visits
to Masters Ashrams, can we really give any credibility to teachings
received in this way from some who believes he visited Mars and spoke
to the martions as in the above. All the stuff on auras and chakras,
astral bodies etc, the psychism and grandiose messages from Masters,
Maitreyas and Solar Lords obscured for a long time the original
teachings of theosophy as given out by HPB and the Masters.

Remember Master KH writes that the Secret Doctrine was a triple
production of Himself, Master M and HPB. When Leadbeater wrties
something in direct opposition to what is stated by them in the Secret
Doctrine - is that just a variation on the teaching or a distortion of
the teaching?

When the Masters write that Maitreya, the 5th Buddha, will not come
until the end of the great cycle (some millions of years in the
future) yet Leadbeater claims to be receiving personal instruction
(through his astral visits & so on) from the Lord Maitreya and that
Maitreya is preparing to come as the World Teacher in the early 1900s
- is this a variation or different expression of the teachings of
Theosophy or a distortion?

If Leadbeater was wrong and deluded about his converstations with Lord
Maitreya, can we have trust in any of the Theosophical teachings he
passed on from the Masters recived via astral travels or clairvoyant
communication as he claimed in all the above? Or should we just
rationalise his delusions and say Leadbeater just had a different way
of expression the truth, and no need to worry because the truth isn't
something that can be pinned down anyway?

Murthy
 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]