Theos-Talk Archives (August 2008 Message tt00092)

Morten,
  here are a couple of links that complement the thread topic.

Ajativada - Wikipedia

>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajativada<<<

Mandukya Karika of Gaudapada

>>>http://www.spiritual-teachers.com/mandukya.htm<<<

Regards,
John

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@stofanet.dk> 
To all readers

Gupta-Vidya is according to H. P. Blavatsky the same as Atma-Vidya, "Gnosis", and Brahma-Vidya.
The God of the Theologians is simply an imaginary power . . . Our chief aim is to deliver humanity of this nightmare, to teach man virtue for its own sake, and to walk in life relying on himself instead of leaning on a theological crutch, that for countless ages was the direct cause of nearly all human misery.

Master K. H. said:
"Neither our philosophy nor ourselves believe in a God, least of all in one whose pronoun necessitates a capital H. Our philosophy falls under the definition of Hobbes. It is preeminently the science of effects by their causes and of causes by their effects, and since it is also the science of things deduced from first principle, as Bacon defines it, before we admit any such principle we must know it, and have no right to admit even its possibility. . . . We know there are planetary and other spiritual lives, and we know there is in our system no such thing as God, either personal or impersonal. Parabrahm is not a God, but absolute immutable law, and Iswar is the effect of Avidya and Maya, ignorance based upon the great delusion. The word "God" was invented to designate the unknown cause of those effects which man has either admired or dreaded without understanding them, and since we claim . . . the knowledge of that cause and causes, we are in a position to maintain there is no Go
d or Gods behind them. 
The idea of God is not an innate but an acquired notion, . . . But while we assign to all the phenomena that proceed from the infinite and limitless space, duration and motion, material, natural, sensible and known (to us at least) cause, the theists assign them spiritual, super- natural and unintelligible and un-known causes. The God of the Theologians is simply an imaginary power . . . Our chief aim is to deliver humanity of this nightmare, to teach man virtue for its own sake, and to walk in life relying on himself instead of leaning on a theological crutch, that for countless ages was the direct cause of nearly all human misery. . . . "

....... Master K. H. said later .......
"I will point out the greatest, the chief cause of nearly two-thirds of the evils that purpose humanity ever since that cause became a power. It is religion under what ever form and in whatsoever nation. It is the sacerdotal caste, the priesthood and the churches; it is in those illusions that man looks upon as sacred, that he has to search out the source of that multitude of evils which is the great curse of humanity and that almost overwhelms mankind. Ignorance created Gods and cunning took advantage of the opportunity."
http://www.theosophy-nw.org/theosnw/evol/ev-kh.htm

H. P. Blavatsky said:
"This is the view of every one of the six great schools of Indian philosophy -- the six principles of that unit body of WISDOM of which the "gnosis," the hidden knowledge, is the seventh."
("The Secret Doctrine" by H. P. Blavatsky; vol. 1, p. 278)

H. P. Blavatsky said:
"And how many are capable of bringing themselves to even a superficial comprehension of Atma-Vidya (Spirit-Knowledge), or what is called by the Sufis, Rohanee! "
("The Secret Doctrine" by H. P. Blavatsky; vol. 1, p. 199)
http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/SDVolume_I.htm

H. P. Blavatsky said:
"If one turns to the ancient literature of the Semitic religions, to the Chaldean Scriptures, the elder sister and instructress, if not the fountainhead of the Mosaic Bible, the basis and starting-point of Christianity, what do the scholars find? To perpetuate the memory of the ancient religions of Babylon; to record the vast cycle of astronomical observations of the Chaldean Magi; to justify the tradition of their splendid and eminently occult literature, what now remains?â??only a few fragments, said to be by Berosus.

These, however, are almost valueless, even as a clue to the character of what has disappeared. For they passed through the hands of his Reverence the Bishop of Cæsareaâ??that self-constituted censor and editor of the sacred records of other menâ??s religionsâ??and they doubtless bear to this day the mark of his eminently veracious and trustworthy hand. For what is the history of this treatise on the once grand religion of Babylon? 

Written in Greek by Berosus, a priest of the temple of Belus, for Alexander the Great, from the astronomical and chronological records preserved by the priests of that temple, and covering a period of 200,000 years, it is now lost. In the first century B.C. Alexander Polyhistor made a series of extracts from itâ??also lost. Eusebius used these extracts in writing his Chronicon (270â??340 A.D.). The points of resemblanceâ??almost of identityâ??between the Jewish and the Chaldean Scriptures,* made the latter most dangerous to Eusebius, in his rôle of defender and champion of the new faith which had adopted the Jewish Scriptures, and with them an absurd chronology. It is pretty certain that Eusebius did not spare the Egyptian Synchronistic tables of Manethoâ??so much so that Bunsenâ? charges him with mutilating history most unscrupulously. And Socrates, a historian of the fifth century, and Syncellus, vice-patriarch of Constantinople (eighth century), both denounce him as the most da
ring and desperate forger.
Is it likely, then, that he dealt more tenderly with the Chaldean records, which were already menacing the new religion, so rashly accepted?
â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??â??
* Found out and proven only now, through the discoveries made by George Smith (vide his â??Chaldean account of Genesisâ??), and which, thanks to this Armenian forger, have misled all the civilized nations for over 1,500 years into accepting Jewish derivations for direct Divine Revelation!

â? Bunsenâ??s â??Egyptâ??s Place in History,â?? vol. i. p. 200"
("The Secret Doctrine" by H. P. Blavatsky; vol. 1, p. xxvi)
http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/SDVolume_I.htm

H. P. Blavatsky said:
"But "Creation" having been invented on the dualistic system as the "prerogative of God alone," the legitimate attribute patented by theology in the name of an infinite deity of their own making, this power had to be regarded as "Satanic," and as an usurpation of divine rights. Thus, the foregoing, in the light of such narrow views, must naturally be considered as a terrible slander on man, "created in the image of God," a still more dreadful blasphemy in the face of the dead-letter dogma. "Your doctrine," the Occultists were already told, "makes of man, created out of dust in the likeness of his God, a vehicle of the Devil, from the first." "Why did you make of your god a devil â?? both, moreover, created in your own image?" is our reply. The esoteric interpretation of the Bible, however, sufficiently refutes this slanderous invention of theology; the Secret Doctrine must some day become the just Karma of the Churches â?? more anti-Christian than the representative assemblies of t
he most confirmed Materialists and Atheists."
("The Secret Doctrine" by H. P. Blavatsky; vol. 2, p. 228)
http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/SDVolume2.htm

H. P. Blavatsky said:
"Of the four Vidyasâ??out of the seven branches of Knowledge mentioned in the Purânasâ??namely, "Yajna-Vidya" (the performance of religious rites in order to produce certain results); "Maha-Vidya," the great (Magic) knowledge, now degenerated into Tantrika worship; "Guhya-Vidya," the science of Mantras and their true rhythm or chanting, of mystical incantations, etc.â??it is only the last one, "Atma-Vidya," or the true Spiritual and Divine wisdom, which can throw absolute and final light upon the teachings of the three first named. Without the help of Atma-Vidya, the other three remain no better than surface sciences, geometrical magnitudes having length and breadth, but no thickness. They are like the soul, limbs, and mind of a sleeping man: capable of mechanical motions, of chaotic dreams and even sleep-walking, of producing visible effects, but stimulated by instinctual not intellectual causes, least of all by fully conscious spiritual impulses. A good deal can be given out and
 explained from the three first-named sciences. But unless the key to their teachings is furnished by Atma-Vidya, they will remain for ever like the fragments of a mangled text-book, like the adumbrations of great truths, dimly perceived by the most spiritual, but distorted out of all proportion by those who would nail every shadow to the wall."
("The Secret Doctrine" by H. P. Blavatsky; vol. 1, p. 169)
http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/SDVolume_I.htm

H. P. Blavatsky said:
"But it is perhaps desirable to state unequivocally that the teachings, however fragmentary and incomplete, contained in these volumes, belong neither to the Hindu, the Zoroastrian, the Chaldean, nor the Egyptian religion, neither to Buddhism, Islam, Judaism nor Christianity exclusively. The Secret Doctrine is the essence of all these. Sprung from it in their origins, the various religious schemes are now made to merge back into their original element, out of which every mystery and dogma has grown, developed, and become materialised. "
("The Secret Doctrine" by H. P. Blavatsky; vol. 1, p. viii)
http://www.phx-ult-lodge.org/SDVolume_I.htm

M. Sufilight

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]