Theos-Talk Archives (August 2008 Message tt00047)

Anand, you write:

"I read messages of the followers of Blavatsky. Many of them say God
does not exist and many say God exists. Those followers of Blavatsky,
who believe in the existence of God, have different ideas about nature
of God. That proves Blavatsky has not conveyed exactly what she meant
on the subject of God."

Anand, "funny" reasoning you seem to display in the above statement
because I would suggest that this statement of yours could probably 
apply to any religious teacher or any philosopher or any religious 
book, etc.

For example, let us take Jesus and the Biblical teachings.

"I read messages of the followers of Jesus (or the Bible).  Those 
followers have different ideas about nature of God.  That proves 
Jesus (or the Bible) has not conveyed...."

Or take Krishna's teachings:

"I read messages of the followers of Krishna.  Those followers have 
different ideas about nature of God.  That proves Krishna has not 
conveyed...."

Or take Hinduism:

"I read messages of the followers of Hinduism.  Those followers have 
different ideas about nature of God.  That proves Hinduism has not 
conveyed...."

Example after example could be given.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc