theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: Understanding Krishnamurti

Jul 17, 2008 09:28 PM
by Cass Silva


Whatever truths he learned from Leadbeater he abandoned like a hot potato
Cass



----- Original Message ----
From: t_s_theosophist <THEOSOPHIST@webtv.net>
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, 14 July, 2008 6:10:30 PM
Subject: Theos-World Re: Understanding Krishnamurti



--- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@ ...> wrote:
>
> Dear William,
> Your message sounded impressive, but the biggest problem with
> Krishnamurti' s teaching is he is wrong at fundamental level. 
> On these most important points he was wrong.
> 
> > What Krishnamurti Did do was to denounce the reliance on any
> oganization, or outside persona 
> > no matter who that person was or claimed to be. He taught that you
> do not need organizations, you do not need Gurus, you do not need
> Priests or intermediaries. Look to Ishvar Guru, the Atman within, this
> is the Only Guru you need. 
> > 
> 
> Please consider the teachings of advanced disciples like Blavatsky,
> Subba Rao, Annie Besant, C. W. Leadbeater, Damodar Mavlankar.
> According to them even if a disciple should become self-reliant,
> contempt of Guru is not at all justified at any stage on the path of
> discipleship. As we know Blavatsky learned many things in Tibetan
> Ashram, which is obviously a small organization. So Krishnamurti' s
> teaching is wrong at fundamental level, though he managed to impressed
> people by telling some other good truths which he learned from Annie
> Besant and Leadbeater.
> Best,
> Anand Gholap
>

============ ====

Dear Bro Anand;

I respect You and your right to hold your views, But I fundamentally Dis-agree with you.

H.P.B., Annie Besant & C.W.L. were all disciples of the Masters of Wisdom,from the Great Brotherhood.
As their representatives they gave us certain teachings which we know as "Theosophy." I am in agreement with you that both Annie Besant and C.W.L. are Great Saints and follow and respect their interpretation of Theosophy.

It is "The Brotherhood" which we must look to as the actual "Source " of our teachings and Not any particular discple, however much we may admire them. We are told that at the head of The Brotherhood a Great August Being known as "The World Teacher" is one of the presiders along with others. 

Disciples however advanced they may be, and have certain advanced Vision, are still human beings subject to minor error and confusion of interpretation.

When the World Teacher speaks no disciple would be presumptious enough to condradict Him, as at His State of Being includes Superior Vision and Wisdom. 

Krishnaurti was the expression of The World Teacher, and his message does Not contradict Theosophy,
rather it is a Fulfilment of Theosophy.

I think that it may be OUR interpretion of Theosophy that needs adjustment. 

Warm Fraternal Greetings;

William Delahunt
Orlando, Forida

Theosophist@ webtv.net
http://www.tso- orlado.org

============ ========= ===== 

 


      Start at the new Yahoo!7 for a better online experience. www.yahoo7.com.au

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application