Theos-Talk Archives (June 2008 Message tt00134)

> H. P. Blavatsky wrote about the plot of the Jesuits 
> ". . . . . It would be well perhaps, if the Jesuits contented
themselves with making dupes of Freemasons and opposing the
Theosophists and Occultists using for it the Protestant clergy as
"cat's paw." But their plottings have a much wider scope, and embrace
a minuteness of detail and care of which the world in general has no
idea. Everything is done by them to bring the mass of mankind again to
the state of passive ignorance which they well know is the only one
which can help them to the consummation of their purpose of Universal
Despotism." 
> (from THE LETTERS OF H. P. BLAVATSKY to A. P. SINNETT and OTHER
MISCELLANEOUS LETTERS TRANSCRIBED, COMPILED, AND WITH AN INTRODUCTION
By A. T. BARKER. First Published 1925)


I have good relations with many Jesuits. I have observed their life
and what they teach. Most of them live very simple life, even if they
could have earned wealth. Most of them are celibate, which is hard
thing to observe. They teach virtues to their followers. Many of them
are among the most cultured, civilized and learned people. So if
anybody says that all Jesuits are bad, I disagree. 

Blavatsky might be opposed by some Jesuits. But partly Blavatsky
herself was responsible for it. And because of her own shortcomings
she attracted opposition from many different people. And she retaliated. 
Krishnamurti misleads people on wholesale scale. Blavatsky's some
statements mislead people on retail scale.

Anand Gholap