Theos-Talk Archives (June 2008 Message tt00092)

The integrity of the envelopes from beginning to end should be protected.
This is where the third party handling it would guarantee it.

mkr


On 6/10/08, Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>   --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
>
> > I am increasingly feeling that whole constitution of the TS needs
> > to be revised and many improvements should be done.
>
> Moreover, it seems to me that the Rules were broken. Rules don't
> mention that the lesser envelope with the voting slip should be named.
> On the contrary, it seems that these envelopes were invented to
> provide anonymous voting. The secretary opens the bigger evvelope to
> make sure that the voice was received from the member in a good
> standing, and then joins the lesser envelope to the bulk of already
> received. Unfortunalely, the Rules don't mention that there shouldn't
> be any names on the lesser envelope. Yet it is mentioned that the
> envelopes containing results of the sections should be marked.
>
> 
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]