Theos-Talk Archives (April 2008 Message tt00283)

That's like saying you can accept Higher manas but reject Lower manas
  Cass

Anand <AnandGholap@gmail.com> wrote:
          Krishnamurti's teaching is clearly opposite of what Theosophy teaches.
You can either accept Theosophy and reject Krishnamurti, or you can
reject Theosophy and accept Krishnamurti. 
Krishnamurti's speeches are logically false. His statements can be
easily proved wrong. And I have written about it few months back in
many forums.
People attach lofty meaning to Krishnamurti's nonsense like truth is
pathless land and such absurd statements. 
Anand Gholap

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Jokela Petri <jokelap@...> wrote:
>
> Laughing out loud:-)
> I have never ever heard anyone who has so badly misundertood JK.
> 
> PJ
> 
> 
> Anand kirjoitti:
> >
> > J. Krishnamurti rejected Masters. He rejected following Masters. He
> > rejected existence of path of occultism. Krishnamurti told people not
> > to read books on spirituality and Theosophy. Krishnamurti told people
> > to reject all teaching given by all great teachers including Jesus.
> > Krishnamurti rejected idea of evolution. Krishnamurti talks of instant
> > self realization. But in last seventy years nobody realized self by
> > following his teaching. All this prove that Krishnamurti was a failure
> > on the path of occultism. I am thinking of writing an article on how
> > Krishnamurti failed on the path of occultism.
> > It will give nightmares to fanatic followers of Krishnamurti. After
> > reading my article on Krishnamurti, his followers will grind their
> > teeth in darkness. They will cry. But that is what they deserve. God
> > gives this punishment because Krishnamurti removed faith of people in
> > God and scriptures.
> > Regards.
> > Anand Gholap
> >
> >
>



                           

       
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]