theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Theos-World Re: Blavatsky-fundamentalists partying at Beverly Hills

Nov 17, 2007 11:28 AM
by christinaleestemaker


-So ...  from bloody vampiring  , you musquito......

to veloci       rapping   ...tor= beetle....


a real fast reptilian   


by the way what is a velociraptor, never heard about such thing?

Christina from Blavatskyhills.






-- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Drpsionic@... wrote:
>
> 
> The Human Velociraptor strikes again!!? Ha Ha!
> 
> 
> 
> Chuck the Reptilian Heretic
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/c_cosimano 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cass Silva <silva_cass@...>
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:02 am
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky-fundamentalists partying at 
Beverly Hills
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe that explains Chuck!!! lol
> Cass
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Frank Reitemeyer <dzyan@...>
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 11:40:56 AM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky-fundamentalists partying at 
Beverly Hills
> 
> With HPB one has to discriminate three things:
> 
> 1. The ancient wisdom - Theosophy
> 2. It's imperfect vehicle - Theosophical Society/Movement
> 3. Theosophists
> 
> Furthermore there are also merely members of a theosophical group.
> 
> In this discrimination lies your answer.
> 
> The manasa-putras cannot modify your ego.
> It's up to you and only to you to grow.
> If you don't want to go higher, no manasa-putra and no Jesus on the 
cross 
> can do it for you.
> 
> Icke seems to have true information from ancient wisdom with 
misinformation 
> combined.
> But I fear the reptiles are really among us.
> Frank
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: opetha
> To: theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 12:36 AM
> Subject: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky-fundament alists partying at 
Beverly Hills
> 
> Hello be it,
> 
> I like hearing the term "Blavatski fundementalist" , is it with 
pride
> and acceptance you use this phrase (as a theosophist? because I have
> always felt that the theosophical movement was based on rhetoric and
> not experience (i.e. meditation).
> 
> I mentioned something like this on the anthrospophy site and got a
> death threat from a coven girl....is Blavatski the new Mohammed and
> Secret Doctrine the new Q'uran?
> 
> But to change the subject a little bit...theosophy teaches that this
> fourth manvantara is remarked by spiritual powers modifying man's 
EGO
> (mind/manas) . This is interesting if we equate the facts of modern
> society, its informational overload---includin g occult as 
information- --
> and how the personality of the modernite justifies itself with EGO-
> totems. Is it safe to say that the rise in consciousness that we are
> seeing, not with yogi's and magicians, but with TV personalities and
> youngsters extraverted arrogance, and the overcoming of romance in 
film
> and cinema with plastic ruthlessness- -is this the work of the
> predominant architects? work that has detroyed soul in music and 
cinema?
> 
> If it is then do you see the pattern in which modern "esotericists"
> have sided *against* Christianity, for not providing for the EGO-
mind
> as Thelema, theosophy etc, do? here is the battle of soul versus 
spirit.
> 
> I suppose the Manasa-Pitris have been modifying man's EGO-mind for a
> much longer period than this relatively recent fall of Christianity 
and
> rise in modernity, so if the rise in informational mind is the work 
of
> natural forces then we can only guess why it is now that they've 
made
> the ruthless boost.
> 
> This reminds one of the "Pleadian Agenda" of the Mayan-new agers and
> David Ike's reptile paranoia (or even Rael's alien creators). It's a
> question of how the modifiers relate to these similar ideas and what
> faction after all is the benefactor and which the enslaver, etc. 
etc.
> 
> Godot.
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@ ...> 
wrote:
> >
> > Theo-talk list completed it's seven years a month back. In all 
these
> > seven years lowest number of messages in a month were in October 
2007.
> > In this month, it received just 80 posts. What does this indicate
 ?
> > Does this mean that interest in Theos-talk is reducing ? Does this
> > mean members think time can be used in better way than talking at
> > Theos-talk ? According to sources, Blavatsky-fundament alists were
> > partying at Beverly Hills.
> > Anand
> >
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> Be a better pen pal. 
> Text or chat with friends inside Yahoo! Mail. See how. http://
overview.mail.yahoo.com/
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
________________________________________________________________________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL 
Mail! - http://mail.aol.com
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application