Theos-World Re: Secret code in "Isis Unveiled"?
Nov 14, 2007 01:06 PM
by christinaleestemaker
No in the book Isis unveiled as mentioned pag 394-405
HPB wrote this secret alphabet used by sovereigns of freemansonry and
Rosecrusians and knights of Heredom and Kadosh and much more.
I copied the pages here under, but it is a pity the copy does not
show the tables on alphabet and hieroglyf of Kad.
see by yourself on
Isis Unveiled by H. P. Blavatsky -- Vol. 2
Theosophical University Press Online Edition
to be find through
http://www.theosophy.info/
Vr gr christina
CHAPTER VIII.
JESUITRY AND MASONRY.
The Sohar and Rabbi Simeon . . . 348
The Order of Jesuits and its relation to some of the Masonic orders
. . . 352
Crimes permitted to its members . . . 355
Principles of Jesuitry compared with those of Pagan moralists . . .
364
Trinity of man in Egyptian Book of the Dead . . . 367
Freemasonry no longer esoteric . . . 372
Persecution of Templars by the Church . . . 381
Secret Masonic ciphers . . . 395
Jehovah not the "Ineffable Name" . . . 398
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 393 THE "CABLE TOW" OF LAMAS AND BRAHMAN-SANNYASI.
square hats are worn unto this day by the Armenian priests. The claim
that the cross is purely a Christian symbol introduced after our era,
is strange indeed, when we find Ezekiel stamping the foreheads of the
men of Judah, who feared the Lord (Ezekiel ix. 4), with the signa
Thau, as it is translated in the Vulgate. In the ancient Hebrew this
sign was formed thus but in the original Egyptian hieroglyphics as a
perfect Christian cross . In the Revelation, also, the "Alpha and
Omega" (spirit and matter), the first and the last, stamps the name
of his Father in the foreheads of the elect.
And if our statements are wrong, if Jesus was not an initiate, a
Master-builder, or Master-Mason as it is now called, how comes it,
that on the most ancient cathedrals we find his figure with Mason's
marks about his person? In the Cathedral of Santa Croce, Florence,
over the main portal can be seen the figure of Christ holding a
perfect square in his hand.
The surviving "Master-builders" of the operative craft of the true
Temple, may go literally half-naked and wander slipshod for ever --
now not for the sake of a puerile ceremony, but because, like the
"Son of man," they have not where to lay their heads -- and yet be
the only surviving possessors of the "Word." Their "cable-tow" is the
sacred triple cord of certain Brahman-Sannyasi, or the string on
which certain lamas hang their yu-stone; but with these apparently
valueless talismans, not one of them would part for all the wealth of
Solomon and Sheba. The seven-knotted bamboo stick of the fakir can
become as powerful as the rod of Moses "which was created between the
evenings, and on which was engraven and set forth the great and
glorious NAME, with which he was to do the wonders in Mizraim."
But these "operative workmen" have no fear that their secrets will be
disclosed by treacherous ex-high priests of chapters, though their
generation may have received them through others than "Moses,
Solomon, and Zerubbabel." Had Moses Michael Hayes, the Israelite
Brother who introduced Royal Arch Masonry into this country (in
December, 1778),* had a prophetic presentiment of future treasons, he
might have instituted more efficacious obligations than he has.
Truly, the grand omnific Royal Arch word, "long lost but now found,"
has fulfilled its prophetic promise. The password of that degree is
no more "I AM THAT I AM." It is now simply "I was but am no more!"
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* The first Grand Chapter was instituted at Philadelphia, in 1797.
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 394 ISIS UNVEILED.
That we may not be accused of vain boasting, we shall give the keys
to several of the secret ciphers of the most exclusive and important
of the so-called higher Masonic degrees. If we mistake not, these
have never before been revealed to the outside world (except that of
the Royal Arch Masons, in 1830), but have been most jealously guarded
within the various Orders. We are under neither promise, obligation,
nor oath; and therefore violate no confidence. Our purpose is not to
gratify an idle curiosity; we wish merely to show Masons and the
affiliates of all other Western societies -- the Company of Jesus
included -- that it is impossible for them to be secure in the
possession of any secrets that it is worth an Eastern Brotherhood's
while to discover. Inferentially, it may also show them that if the
latter can lift the masks of European societies, they are
nevertheless successful in wearing their own visors; for, if any one
thing is universally acknowledged, it is that the real secrets of not
a single surviving ancient brotherhood are in possession of the
profane.
Some of these ciphers were used by the Jesuits in their secret
correspondence at the time of the Jacobin conspiracy, and when
Masonry (the alleged successor to the Temple) was employed by the
Church for political purposes.
Findel says (see his History of Freemasonry, p. 253) that in the
eighteenth century, "besides the modern Knights Templar, we see the
Jesuits . . . disfiguring the fair face of Freemasonry. Many Masonic
authors, who were fully cognizant of the period, and knew exactly all
the incidents occurring, positively assert that then and still later
the Jesuits exercised a pernicious influence, or at least endeavored
to do so, upon the fraternity." Of the Rosicrucian Order he remarks,
upon the authority of Prof. Woog, that its "aim at first . . . was
nothing less than the support and advancement of Catholicism. When
this religion manifested a determination entirely to repress liberty
of thought . . . the Rosicrucians enlarged their designs likewise to
check, if possible, the progress of this widely-spreading
enlightenment."
In the Sincerus Renatus (the truly converted) of S. Richter, of
Berlin (1714), we note that laws were communicated for the government
of the "Golden Rosicrucians," which "bear unmistakable evidences of
Jesuitical intervention."
We will begin with the cryptographs of the "Sovereign Princes Rose
Croix," also styled Knights of St. Andrew, Knights of the Eagle and
Pelican, Heredom, Rosae Crucis, Rosy Cross, Triple Cross, Perfect
Brother, Prince Mason, and so on. The "Heredom Rosy Cross" also
claims a Templar origin, in 1314.*
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* See Yarker's "Notes on the Mysteries of Antiquity," p. 153.
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 395 SECRET CIPHERS EXPOSED.
The Knights Kadosh have another cipher -- or rather hieroglyph --
which, in this case, is taken from the Hebrew, possibly to be the
more in keeping with the Bible Kadeshim of the Temple.*
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* See 2 Kings, xxiii. 7, Hebrew text, and English, the former
especially. In the degree of Kadosh, a lecture is given upon the
descent of Masonry through Moses, Solomon, the Essenes, and the
Templars. Christian K. K.'s may get some light as to the kind of
"Temple" their ancestors would, in such a genealogical descent, have
been attached to, by consulting verse 13 of the same chapter as above
quoted.
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 396 ISIS UNVEILED.
As for the Royal Arch cipher, it has been exposed before now, but we
may as well present it slightly amplified.
This cipher consists of certain combinations of right angles, with or
without points or dots. Following is the basis of its Formation.
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 397 JESUIT CRYPTOGRAPHY.
Now, the alphabet consists of twenty-six letters, and these two signs
being dissected, form thirteen distinct characters, thus:
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 398 ISIS UNVEILED.
Let this suffice. We might, if we chose, give the cipher alphabets
with their keys, of another method of the Royal Arch Masons, strongly
resembling a certain Hindu character; of the G El of the Mystic City;
of a well-known form of the Devanagari script of the (French) Sages
of the Pyramids; and of the Sublime Master of the Great Work, and
others. But we refrain; only, be it understood, for the reason that
some of these alone of all the side branches of the original Blue
Lodge Freemasonry, contain the promise of a useful future. As for the
rest, they may and will go to the ash-heap of time. High Masons will
understand what we mean.
We must now give some proofs of what we have stated, and demonstrate
that the word Jehovah, if Masonry adheres to it, will ever remain as
a substitute, never be identical with the lost mirific name. This is
so well known to the kabalists, that in their careful etymology of
the they show it beyond doubt to be only one of the many substitutes
for the real name, and composed of the two-fold name of the first
androgyne -- Adam and Eve, Jod (or Yodh), Vau and He-Va -- the female
serpent as a symbol of Divine Intelligence proceeding from the ONE-
Generative or Creative Spirit.* Thus, Jehovah is not the sacred name
at all. Had Moses given to Pharaoh the true "name," the latter would
not have answered as he did, for the Egyptian King-Initiates knew it
as well as Moses, who had learned it with them. The "name" was at
that time the common property of the adepts of all the nations in the
world, and Pharaoh knew certainly the "name" of the Highest God
mentioned in the Book of the Dead. But instead of that, Moses (if we
accept the allegory of Exodus literally), gives Pharaoh the name of
Yeva, the expression or form of the Divine name used by all the
Targums as passed by Moses. Hence Pharaoh's reply: "And who is that
Yeva** that I should obey his voice?"
"Jehovah" dates only from the Masoretic innovation. When the Rabbis,
for fear that they should lose the keys to their own doctrines, then
written exclusively in consonants, began to insert their vowel-points
in their manuscripts, they were utterly ignorant of the true
pronunciation of the NAME. Hence, they gave it the sound of Adonah,
and made it read Ja-ho-vah. Thus the latter is simply a fancy, a
perversion of the Holy Name. And how could they know it? Alone, out
of all their nation the high priests had it in their possession, and
respectively passed it to their successors, as the Hindu Brahmatma
does before his death. Once a year only, on the day of atonement, the
high priest was
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* See Eliphas Levi's "Dogme et Rituel," Vol. i.
** Yeva is Heva, the feminine counterpart of Jehovah-Binah.
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 399 THE PRIEST BEHIND THE VEIL.
allowed to pronounce it in a whisper. Passing behind the veil into
the inner chamber of the sanctuary, the Holy of Holies, with
trembling lips and downcast eyes he called upon the dreaded NAME. The
bitter persecution of the kabalists, who received the precious
syllables after deserving the favor by a whole life of sanctity, was
due to a suspicion that they misused it. At the opening of this
chapter we have told the story of Simeon Ben-Iochai, one of the
victims to this priceless knowledge, and see how little he deserved
his cruel treatment.
The Book of Jasher, a work -- as we are told by a very learned Hebrew
divine, of New York -- composed in Spain in the twelfth century as "a
popular tale," and that had not "the sanction of the Rabbinical
College of Venice," is full of kabalistical, alchemical, and magical
allegories. Admitting so much, it must still be said that there are
few popular tales but are based on historical truths. The Norsemen in
Iceland, by Dr. G. W. Dasent, is also a collection of popular tales,
but they contain the key to the primitive religious worship of that
people. So with the Book of Jasher. It contains the whole of the Old
Testament in a condensed form, and as the Samaritans held, i.e., the
five Books of Moses, without the Prophets. Although rejected by the
orthodox Rabbis, we cannot help thinking that, as in the case of the
apocryphal Gospels, which were written earlier than the canonical
ones, the Book of Jasher is the true original from which the
subsequent Bible was in part composed. Both the apocryphal Gospels
and Jasher, are a series of religious tales, in which miracle is
heaped upon miracle, and which narrate the popular legends as they
first originated, without any regard to either chronology or dogma.
Still both are corner-stones of the Mosaic and Christian religions.
That there was a Book of Jasher prior to the Mosaic Pentateuch is
clear, for it is mentioned in Joshua, Isaiah, and 2 Samuel.
Nowhere is the difference between the Elohists and Jehovists so
clearly shown as in Jasher. Jehovah is here spoken of as the Ophites
held him to be, a Son of Ilda-Baoth, or Saturn. In this Book, the
Egyptian Magi, when asked by Pharaoh "Who is he, of whom Moses speaks
as the I am?" reply that the God of Moses "we have learned, is the
Son of the Wise, the Son of ancient kings" (ch. lxxix. 45).* Now,
those who assert that Jasher is a forgery of the twelfth century --
and we readily believe it -- should nevertheless explain the curious
fact that, while the above text is not to be found in the Bible, the
answer to it is,
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* We find a very suggestive point in connection with this appellation
of Jehovah, "Son of ancient Kings," in the Jaina sect of Hindustan,
known as the Sauryas. They admit that Brahma is a Devata, but deny
his creative power, and call him the "Son of a King." See "Asiatic
Researches," vol. ix., p. 279.
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 400 ISIS UNVEILED.
and is, moreover, couched in unequivocal terms. At Isaiah xix. 11,
the "Lord God" complains of it very wrathfully to the prophet, and
says: "Surely the princes of Zoan are fools, the counsel of the wise
counsellors of Pharaoh is become brutish; how say ye unto Pharaoh, I
am the Son of the Wise, the Son of ancient kings?" which is evidently
a reply to the above. At Joshua x. 13, Jasher is referred to in
corroboration of the outrageous assertion that the sun stood still,
and the moon stayed until the people had avenged themselves. "Is not
this written in the Book of Jasher?" says the text. And at 2 Samuel,
i. 19, the same book is again quoted. "Behold," it says, "it is
written in the Book of Jasher." Clearly, Jasher must have existed; it
must have been regarded as authority; must have been older than
Joshua; and, since the verse in Isaiah unerringly points to the
passage above quoted, we have at least as much reason to accept the
current edition of Jasher as a transcription, excerpt, or compilation
of the original work, as we have to revere the Septuagint Pentateuch,
as the primitive Hebraic sacred records.
At all events, Jehovah is not the ancient of the ancient, or "aged of
the aged," of the Sohar; for we find him, in this book, counselling
with God the Father as to the creation of the world. "The work-master
spoke to the Lord. Let us make man after our image" (Sohar i., fol.
25). Jehovah is but the Metatron, and perhaps, not even the highest,
but only one of the AEons; for he whom Onkelos calls Memro, the
"Word," is not the exoteric Jehovah of the Bible, nor is he Jahve the
Existing One.
It was the secresy of the early kabalists, who were anxious to screen
the real Mystery name of the "Eternal" from profanation, and later
the prudence which the mediaeval alchemists and occultists were
compelled to adopt to save their lives, that caused the inextricable
confusion of divine names. This is what led the people to accept the
Jehovah of the Bible as the name of the "One living God." Every
Jewish elder, prophet, and other man of any importance knew the
difference; but as the difference lay in the vocalization of the
"name," and its right pronunciation led to death, the common people
were ignorant of it, for no initiate would risk his life by teaching
it to them. Thus the Sinaitic deity came gradually to be regarded as
identical with "Him whose name is known but to the wise." When
Capellus translates: "Whosoever shall pronounce the name of Jehovah,
shall suffer death," he makes two mistakes. The first is in adding
the final letter h to the name, if he wants this deity to be
considered either male or androgynous, for the letter makes the name
feminine, as it really should be, considering it is one of the names
of Binah, the third emanation; his second error is in asserting that
the word nokeb means only to pronounce distinctly. It means to
pronounce cor-
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 401 THE DOUBLE SEX OF JEHOVAH.
rectly. Therefore, the biblical name Jehovah may be considered simply
a substitute, which, as belonging to one of the "powers" got to be
viewed as that of the "Eternal." There is an evident mistake (one of
the very many), in one of the texts in Leviticus, which has been
corrected by Cahen, and which proves that the interdiction did not at
all concern the name of the exoteric Jehovah, whose numerous other
names could also be pronounced without any penalty being incurred.*
In the vicious English version, the translation runs thus: "And he
that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall surely be put to death,"
Levit. xxiv. 16. Cahen renders it far more correctly, thus: "And he
that blasphemeth the name of the Eternal shall die," etc. The
"Eternal" being something higher than the exoteric and personal
"Lord."**
As with the Gentile nations, the symbols of the Israelites were ever
bearing, directly or indirectly, upon sun-worship. The exoteric
Jehovah of the Bible is a dual god, like all the other gods; and the
fact that David -- who is entirely ignorant of Moses -- praises his
"Lord," and assures him that the "Lord is a great God, and a great
King above all gods," may be of a very great importance to the
descendants of Jacob and David, but their national God concerns us in
no wise. We are quite ready to show the "Lord God" of Israel the same
respect as we do to Brahma, Zeus, or any other secondary deity. But
we decline, most emphatically, to recognize in him either the Deity
worshipped by Moses, or the "Father" of Jesus, or yet the "Ineffable
Name" of the kabalists. Jehovah is, perhaps, one of the Elohim, who
was concerned in the formation (which is not creation) of the
universe, one of the architects who built from pre-existing matter,
but he never was the "Unknowable" Cause that created "bara," in the
night of the Eternity. These Elohim first form and bless; then they
curse and destroy; as one of these Powers, Jehovah is therefore by
turns beneficent and malevolent; at one moment he punishes and then
repents. He is the antitype of several of the patriarchs -- of Esau
and of Jacob, the allegorical twins, emblems of the ever manifest
dual principle in nature. So Jacob, who is Israel, is the left pillar
-- the feminine principle of Esau, who is the right pillar and the
male principle. When he wrestles with Malach-Iho, the Lord, it is the
latter who becomes the right pillar, and Jacob-Israel names God;
although the Bible-interpreters have endeavored to transform him into
a mere "angel of the Lord" (Genesis xxxii.), Jacob conquers him -- as
matter will but too often conquer spirit -- but his thigh is put out
of joint in the fight.
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* As, for instance, Shaddai, Elohim, Sabaoth, etc.
** Cahen's "Hebrew Bible," iii., p. 117.
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 402 ISIS UNVEILED.
The name of Israel has its derivation from Isaral or Asar, the Sun-
God, who is known as Suryal, Surya, and Sur. Isra-el means "striving
with God." The "sun rising upon Jacob-Israel," is the Sun-God Isaral,
fecundating matter or earth, represented by the female-Jacob. As
usual, the allegory has more than one hidden meaning in the Kabala.
Esau, AEsaou, Asu, is also the sun. Like the "Lord," Esau fights with
Jacob and prevails not. The God-Sun first strives against, and then
rises on him in covenant.
"And as he passed over Penuel, the sun rose upon him, and he (Jacob)
halted upon his thigh" (Genesis xxxii. 31). Israel Jacob, opposed by
his brother Esau, is Samael, and "the names of Samael are Azazel and
Satan" (the opposer).
If it will be argued that Moses was unacquainted with the Hindu
philosophy and, therefore, could not have taken Siva, the regenerator
and the destroyer, as his model for Jehovah, then we must admit that
there was some miraculous international intuition which prompted
every nation to choose for its exoteric national deity the dual type
we find in the "Lord God" of Israel. All these fables speak for
themselves. Siva, Jehovah, Osiris, are all the symbols of the active
principle in nature par excellence. They are the forces which preside
at the formation or regeneration of matter and its destruction. They
are the types of Life and Death, ever fecundating and decomposing
under the never-ceasing influx of the anima mundi, the Universal
intellectual Soul, the invisible but ever-present spirit which is
behind the correlation of the blind forces. This spirit alone is
immutable, and therefore the forces of the universe, cause and
effect, are ever in perfect harmony with this one great Immutable
Law. Spiritual Life is the one primordial principle above; Physical
Life is the primordial principle below, but they are one under their
dual aspect. When the Spirit is completely untrammelled from the
fetters of correlation, and its essence has become so purified as to
be re-united with its CAUSE, it may -- and yet who can tell whether
it really will -- have a glimpse of the Eternal Truth. Till then, let
us not build ourselves idols in our own image, and accept the shadows
for the Eternal Light.
The greatest mistake of the age was to attempt a comparison of the
relative merits of all the ancient religions, and scoff at the
doctrines of the Kabala and other superstitions.
But truth is stranger than fiction; and this world-old adage finds
its application in the case in hand. The "wisdom" of the archaic ages
or the "secret doctrine" embodied in the Oriental Kabala, of which,
as we have said, the Rabbinical is but an abridgment, did not die out
with the Philaletheans of the last Eclectic school. The Gnosis
lingers still on earth, and its votaries are many, albeit unknown.
Such secret
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 403 ADEPTS IN PARIS AND ELSEWHERE.
brotherhoods have been mentioned before Mackenzie's time, by more
than one great author. If they have been regarded as mere fictions of
the novelist, that fact has only helped the "brother-adepts" to keep
their incognito the more easily. We have personally known several of
them who, to their great merriment had had the story of their lodges,
the communities in which they lived, and the wondrous powers which
they had exercised for many long years, laughed at and denied by
unsuspecting skeptics to their very faces. Some of these brothers
belong to the small groups of "travellers." Until the close of the
happy Louis-Philippian reign, they were pompously termed by the
Parisian garcon and trader the nobles etrangers, and as innocently
believed to be "Boyards," Valachian "Gospodars," Indian "Nabobs," and
Hungarian "Margraves," who had gathered at the capital of the
civilized world to admire its monuments and partake of its
dissipations. There are, however, some insane enough to connect the
presence of certain of these mysterious guests in Paris with the
great political events that subsequently took place. Such recall at
least as very remarkable coincidences, the breaking out of the
Revolution of '93, and the earlier explosion of the South Sea Bubble,
soon after the appearance of "noble foreigners," who had convulsed
all Paris for more or less longer periods, by either their mystical
doctrines or "supernatural gifts." The St. Germains and Cagliostros
of this century, having learned bitter lessons from the vilifications
and persecutions of the past, pursue different tactics now-a-days.
But there are numbers of these mystic brotherhoods which have naught
to do with "civilized" countries; and it is in their unknown
communities that are concealed the skeletons of the past. These
"adepts" could, if they chose, lay claim to strange ancestry, and
exhibit verifiable documents that would explain many a mysterious
page in both sacred and profane history. Had the keys to the hieratic
writings and the secret of Egyptian and Hindu symbolism been known to
the Christian Fathers, they would not have allowed a single monument
of old to stand unmutilated. And yet, if we are well informed -- and
we think we are -- there was not one such in all Egypt, but the
secret records of its hieroglyphics were carefully registered by the
sacerdotal caste. These records still exist, though "not extant" for
the general public, though perhaps the monuments may have passed away
for ever out of human sight.
Of forty-seven tombs of the kings, near Gornore, recorded by the
Egyptian priests on their sacred registers, only seventeen were known
to the public, according to Diodorus Siculus, who visited the place
about sixty years B.C. Notwithstanding this historical evidence, we
assert that the whole number exist to this day, and the royal tomb
discovered by
[[Vol. 2, Page]] 404 ISIS UNVEILED.
Belzoni among the sandstone mountains of Biban-el-Melook (Melech?) is
but a feeble specimen of the rest. We will add, furthermore, that the
Arab-Christians, the monks, scattered around in their poor, desolate
convents on the borderland of the great Lybian Desert, know of the
existence of such unbetrayed relics. But they are Copts, sole
remnants of the true Egyptian race, and the Copt predominating over
the Christian monk in their natures, they keep silent; for what
reason it is not for us to tell. There are some who believe that
their monkish attire is but a blind, and that they have chosen these
desolate homes among arid deserts and surrounded by Mahometan tribes,
for some ulterior purposes of their own. Be it as it may, they are
held in great esteem by the Greek monks of Palestine; and there is a
rumor current among the Christian pilgrims of Jerusalem, who throng
the Holy Sepulchre at every Easter, that the holy fire from heaven
will never descend so miraculously as when these monks of the desert
are present to draw it down by their prayers.*
"The kingdom of Heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by
force." Many are the candidates at the doors of those who are
supposed to know the path that leads to the secret brotherhoods. The
great majority are refused admittance, and these turn away
interpreting the refusal as an evidence of the non-existence of any
such secret society. Of the minority accepted, more than two-thirds
fail upon trial. The seventh rule of the ancient Rosicrucian
brotherhoods, which is universal among all true secret societies:
"the Rosy-Crux becomes and is not made," is more than the generality
of men can bear to have applied to them. But let no one suppose that
of the candidates who fail, any will divulge to the world even the
trifle they may have learned, as some Masons do. None know better
than themselves how unlikely it is that a neophyte should ever talk
of what was imparted to him. Thus these societies will go on and hear
themselves denied without uttering a word until the day shall come
for them to throw off their reserve and show how completely they are
masters of the situation.
[[Footnote(s)]] -------------------------------------------------
* The Greek monks have this "miracle" performed for the "faithful"
every year on Easter night. Thousands of pilgrims are there waiting
with their tapers to light them at this sacred fire, which at the
precise hour and when needed, descends from the chapel-vault and
hovers about the sepulchre in tongues of fire until every one of the
thousand pilgrims has lighted his wax taper at it.
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@...>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Cass,
>
> I did not find an online version of the said report "Astrological
Algorithms Contained In Isis Unveiled" and I hope that anyone here
has it for further research.
>
> Hi Christine,
> I don't know which Rosicrucian book do you mean.
> Are you speaking of "The Secret Symbols of the Gold- and
Roscicrucians" by Franz Hartmann?
>
> And in which way can a rosicrucian code be used to decode Isis
Unveiled??
>
> Best
> Frank
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: christinaleestemaker
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 6:26 PM
> Subject: Theos-World Re: Secret code in "Isis Unveiled"?
>
>
> Possibly this is the secret from the Rosecruse page 394-404
> In my books part 2 474-485
> There are given codes and hieroglives and numbers of the knigts of
> Heredom from Kilwinning, Kadoshknights also this codes have to do
> with freemansonry.
> Vr gr Christina
>
> -- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > A linguist called "Sister Adriana-Maria" is said to have done a
> three-years research on HPB's first book Isis Unveiled and that she
> has found a secret code, a "new polyalphabetic cipher":
> > http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1048.htm
> >
> > Has anyone more details of this code?
> >
> > Frank
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
