Re: Theos-World 2012-The Future of Mankind
Feb 13, 2007 01:58 AM
by th.paijmans
The hard evidence was that all these farmers witnessed stones dropping out of the sky. Yet,
hundres of miles
away in their lofty owers of academia, scientists simply stated that since stones were heavier
than air, no stone
could drop out of the sky.
It is this kind of short sightedness that has hampered science considerably; had it make look
away if evidence
was found that would have unhinged a current scientific diogma. Take, for instance, the non-
debate over the
earliest settlements in America, for instance.
regards,
Theo
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: Drpsionic@aol.com
Datum: dinsdag, februari 13, 2007 1:57 am
Onderwerp: Re: Theos-World 2012-The Future of Mankind
>
> In a message dated 2/12/2007 4:55:12 PM Central Standard Time,
> silva_cass@yahoo.com writes:
>
> This was the hard evidence. It is always "hard" until something
> new is
> discovered and it becomes "soft" or "something to build on"
> (excusing the pun!)
>
>
>
> N Rays were never hard evidence. Neither was Od. Hard evidence
> is physical
> evidence and the math is not the the territory.
>
> Worker's villages are hard evidence as is the lack of horse
> skeletons.
> Chuck the Heretic
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application