Theos-Talk Archives (February 2007 Message tt00103)

I agree. I do not know how incidents like the one mentioned makes us to
understand theo-sophia better.

mkr

On 2/9/07, krishtar <krishtar_a@brturbo.com.br> wrote:
>
>   God, who can now, 100 years later say in what circumstances this
> particular subject about that "outrageous behaviour" took place?
> We are only using what was partially written a century ago, yes because 24
> hours of HPB and other at her time were not registered or written down.
> I cannot understand why judging and discussing so many isolated facts can
> help people live and study theosophy essence.
> Many people think that either we can criticize or divinize a historical
> character, but if we do that so, we are ignoring that we are speaking of
> real people, people with faults and virtues that really existed.
> We cannot see HPB or even the Mahatmas as perfect people and us judging
> their behaviour.
> What is important, imo, is what they left and we must use our conscience
> to cull the good teachings.
>
> Krishtar
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Konstantin Zaitzev
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:24 AM
> Subject: Frauds Re: Theos-World Occult atoms
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com <theos-talk%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "nhcareyta" <nhcareyta@...> wrote:
>
> > Are you really suggesting that Blavatsky is responsible for the
> > outrageous behaviour of Bishop Leadbeater and Dr Besant despite
>
> > A lanoo is totally responsible for their actions are they not?
>
> It seems that you haven't caught my point.
> I consider it in a perspective that it is all fraud from beginning to
> the end. No lanoos, as there were no any lanoos in this story. The
> version that all theosophy beginnig from Blavatsky is fraud is much
> more plausible for outside inquirer than only some persons later
> became frauds, especially if they were known as honest people before
> their involvement into theosophy.
> As for outrageous behaviour:
>
> "One morning I was about to go. She said, "Do not go, I have some
> work for you." She gave me a lot of papers to copy, twelve sheets of
> foolscap. I copied it and gave it to her. She looked at it, crumpled
> it and threw it into the waste-basket. She was in a rage."
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/chetty1931.htm
>
> Isn't this behaviour outrageous? The only guilt of poor Subbia was
> that he wrote on both sides of paper instead of one!
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release Date: 2/7/aaaa
> 15:33
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]