Theos-Talk Archives (February 2007 Message tt00101)

God, who can now, 100 years later say in what circumstances this particular subject about that "outrageous behaviour" took place? 
We are only using what was partially written a century ago, yes because 24 hours of HPB and other at her time were not registered or written down.
I cannot understand why judging and discussing so many isolated facts can help people live and study theosophy essence.
Many people think that either  we can criticize or divinize a historical character, but if we do that so, we are ignoring that we are speaking of real people, people with faults and virtues that really existed.
We cannot see HPB or even the Mahatmas as perfect people and us judging their behaviour.
What is important, imo, is what they left and we must use our conscience to cull the good teachings.

Krishtar



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Konstantin Zaitzev 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 8:24 AM
  Subject: Frauds Re: Theos-World Occult atoms


  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "nhcareyta" <nhcareyta@...> wrote:

  > Are you really suggesting that Blavatsky is responsible for the 
  > outrageous behaviour of Bishop Leadbeater and Dr Besant despite

  > A lanoo is totally responsible for their actions are they not?

  It seems that you haven't caught my point.
  I consider it in a perspective that it is all fraud from beginning to 
  the end. No lanoos, as there were no any lanoos in this story. The 
  version that all theosophy beginnig from Blavatsky is fraud is much 
  more plausible for outside inquirer than only some persons later 
  became frauds, especially if they were known as honest people before 
  their involvement into theosophy.
  As for outrageous behaviour:

  "One morning I was about to go. She said, "Do not go, I have some 
  work for you." She gave me a lot of papers to copy, twelve sheets of 
  foolscap. I copied it and gave it to her. She looked at it, crumpled 
  it and threw it into the waste-basket. She was in a rage." 
  http://blavatskyarchives.com/chetty1931.htm

  Isn't this behaviour outrageous? The only guilt of poor Subbia was 
  that he wrote on both sides of paper instead of one!



   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release Date: 2/7/aaaa 15:33


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]