Theos-Talk Archives (January 2007 Message tt00371)

 In a message dated 1/15/07 5:22:16 PM, wry1111@earthlink.net writes:

> Wry: I am not a scientist or a mathmatician, but the fact is that there is 
> no way to mathematically express absolute zero, as it is not a matter of 
> relationship, but of no relationship, and so there will never be a unified field 
> theory. When we use the symbol of zero we are thinking of nothing as no thing 
> (no value of being 1) and all of this is a facet of being in relationship. 
> If anyone tries to go past this point, numerically, it is like beating ones 
> head against a wall.
> 
> 
Leon: Zero-points of absolute space exist (as potentialities of both 
subjective consciousness and objective matter, i.e., spirit + infinite abstract motion 
or spinergy) everywhere -- since there is nothing in between to separate 
them. 

Therefore, they are always "entangled" -- i.e., in coadunation or ONE with 
each other... And, wherever or whenever they are located in the physical 
universe that, itself, is only one cyclic stage or phase in an orderly sequence of 
fractally involved coenergetic fields emanating from its initial zero-point 
spinergy of potential information, memory, mind, physical particle-fields, etc. -- 
which together, both before and after manifestation, constitute a 
"singularity" or unity of infinite potentiality consisting of both spirit or 
consciousness and coenergetic (but not consubstantial) fields and forms of matter.   
Accordingly, the noumena is as real (and countable) as the phenomena.

Thus, all things -- from the subtlest or near infinite frequency-energy order 
spiritual field in hyperspace, to the grossest mass energy field in metric 
space -- are interconnected through their individual zero-point centers of 
origin or potential source of experiential consciousness as well as the field 
itself.   So, nothing contains everything.   As Buddha said, "Nothing comes from 
nothing." Therefore, we could say that nothing becomes everything and everything 
comes from nothing. ;-)   

It follows that this universe -- relative to infinite potential parallel 
universes that are inherent in all zero-points of absolute space -- is, in itself, 
a "singularity" having infinite potentiality of individual experiences and 
phenomenal forms of material substances, both visible and invisible.  Thus, we 
can say that nothing exists along with the existence of everything, both 
nowhere and everywhere simultaneously.   The difference being that "nothing" (i.e., 
the zero-point and its abstract motion, spinergy, or potential energy) has 
eternal existence or infinite duration and infinite divisibility, while 
"everything" (all substantial forms and fields) have only finite existence in time and 
finite divisibility -- limited by their particularity.   Thus, the super 
symmetry of the zero-point and its higher order spiritual fields can be compared to 
the asymmetry of the lower order physical fields (due to their electrodynamic 
repulsive and attractive field interference's).

Therefore, based on the infinite cyclic spinergy of the zero-point, the 
fundamental law governing the existence of everything must be the eternal and 
immutable law of cycles and periodicity.   To realize that, and thereby comprehend 
the true nature of fundamental reality, one needs no physics or mathematical 
symbology other than the multidimensional topological geometry that can be 
visualized in imagination and grasped intuitively by those capable of using their 
higher mind or skilled in meditative mental concentration (Rajah Yoga).   For 
a humorously symbolic 2D picture of the eternal unity and topological geometry 
of the zero-point singularity at the cosmic primal beginning, see: 
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.gif  
Actually, the overall geometry is spherical or 3D -- since the zero-point is 
spinning on its horizontal axis as the dual positive and negative lines of 
force will, after initial manifestation and inflation, continue to radiate 
outward from its opposite poles, as each inner field fractally involves through 
their own zero-point centers, ad infinitum, stepping down in frequency-energy 
phase order until, on the fourth iteration the physical universe appears -- to 
continue its further analogous involution and eventual evolution after symmetry 
breaking.

However, while I see all that relatively clearly in my own mind (after so 
many years of deep meditation on the zero-point) — unless one is completely in 
touch with the intuitive mind from the deepest level of one's zero-point of 
perceptive awareness, I don't expect anyone else to comprehend the nature of the 
metaphysical reality I am trying to describe in such a limited language as 
English...   Although it might be possible with further explanation of how, from 
an electrodynamic engineering POV, our sensory perception system actually works 
— which I have outlined in previous posts with respect to the encoded wave 
interference patterned holographic visual image detected, reconstructed, and 
reflected in our mind field to be perceved by our zero-point of visual awareness 
located in the exact center of our head between the eyes and the ears.

Best wishes,

Leon

---------Original Message---------

Leon wrote:

Fact is I like the words "infinity" and "singularity" -- since Einstein used 
them and I think he envisioned them in the same sense that I do.  That's 
because, having gotten his insight of E=mc^2 and relativity from the same source I 
got my vision of geometric fractal field involutional reality, he couldn't 
help seeing the fundamental Space and its characteristics the same way I do. His 
problem was that, like anyone else today tackling the problem of a grand 
unified field theory, he couldn't come up with a mathematical solution that would 
unify the hyperspace along with the configuration space fields in a way that 
would be acceptable to the materialist physicists wrapped up in the standard 
model, while also offering a solution that would be falsifiable as well as make 
predictions that could objectively be tested experimentally... The same problem 
that is facing string physics and QFT today. 
 --------
 Wry: I am not a scientist or a mathmatician, but the fact is that there is 
no way to mathematically express absolute zero, as it is not a matter of 
relationship, but of no relationship, and so there will never be a unified field 
theory. When we use the symbol of zero we are thinking of nothing as no thing (no 
value of being 1) and all of this is a facet of being in relationship. If 
anyone tries to go past this point, numerically, it is like beating ones head 
against a wall. There is a way to understand certain concepts by experiencing 
them as the dimensionality of being fully alive. To be fully alive one has to 
experience death *as* he is living. This is, for a human being, zero point or 
true singularity. If you think/feel you are going to live forever, this is 
believing yourself  (which is actually a relative reference point made by thought) 
to be true. However, such a  view is false. Thought is not, nor can it ever be, 
equivalent to singularity. Nor can "not thinking", as there is no way to live 
without making reference points. Sheer negation is not a constant because 
then you would have to recognize it as being a thing in order to give it the 
value of being no thing.
  
 Regarding quantum mechanics, I do not understand that much about, but it 
seems to take one facet, an equally distributed field, with oneself as a 
macroscopic entity outside of that, and to play off of it, but there is no way to 
reconcile this with the modalities of being human. Again, one can only act (not 
re-act) things out. This is the only way to discover the meaning of singularity. 
And again, that meaning is relative and dimensional, but it is not ultimately 
true. When you speak of zero as if it is one, that is a logical fallacy.
  
 Why do people employ logical fallacies in their thinking? Because it works 
for them to support how they (need to) feel. Different people need to approach 
the world in different ways. It took me a long time to accept and realize 
this. However, if a person spends his time reasoning with certain people who are 
not ready to see things logically, he will degrade his own opportunity to take 
leaps which are essential for his own time-appropriate development.  
Sincerely, Wry



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]