theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Daniel Has 'No Idea' on the Theft

Nov 24, 2006 12:51 PM
by danielhcaldwell


Carlos,

You write:

==========================================================
In referring to Gregory Tillett's statement that John Algeo took 
possession in an unproper way of John Cooper's research on the HPB 
Letters, you say:

"I have no idea if Tillett is right about this..." 
 
Now, Daniel, don't you think this is too much "absence of 
information" on your part,  for us to be able to believe your 
statement? 
=============================================================

Please then do NOT believe my statement.

I beleive I asked Gregory Tillett here on Theos-Talk to give some 
examples to document what he asserted.

If he did, I never saw them.

In order to see what Gregory Tillett is talking about, I would want 
to compare the published Algeo volume with John Cooper's original 
manuscript to TPH and also compare these two to Boris de Zirkoff's 
orgiginal manuscript which is at Wheaton.

Since I do not have a copy of the Boris manuscript or a copy of 
Cooper's manuscript to Wheaton but only in mircrofiche a copy of 
Cooper's dissertation, I cannot compare all of this material.  Plus 
it would be helpful to know the details of what Tillett was thinking 
about.

Therefore I am not in a position to know if what Tillett says is 
accurate or not.

I like to have details not just vague statements.

Does this help?

Daniel





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application