Stabledon, Fiction
Nov 18, 2006 04:28 AM
by Mark Jaqua
Fiction, Stapledon
Below is John's list of Olaf Stabledon's
books (which disappeared from the previous
post) and also a few paragraphs from his
"Starmaker" which I think is a great piece
of writing.
A lot of truths can be expressed in
fiction that can't be expressed in non-fiction,
and it might be called the voice of the
soul, rather than of the mind, like non-fiction.
Blavatsky and Judge used fiction, like
Blavatsky's "Nightmare tales" and Judge's
short stories, or like Dostoevsky's "The
Grand Inquisitor" which her teacher told
her to translate.
I read recently Cormac McCarthy's
"The Road," which is about a man and his
son in a post-apocalyptic world, walking
the interstates in a desolate world. It's
sort in the same scheme as the "Terminator"
movies, and other sci-fi, and one wonders
where people get the all-too-realistic
ideas for this type of literature. Maybe
it is something in the memory of the
soul, and the fall of civilization that
we have all gone through before, like
the Atlantis legend, and maybe many
times before.
- jake j.
Olaf Stapledon was somewhat of a visionary
of his time, he wrote then about our present
situation of Oil and demand supply shrinkage.
I recommend his books;
<Sirius.... 1944 Penguin Books Paperback
<Star Maker ...... 1937 " "
<The Last and First Men .... 1930 "
<The Last Men in London .... 1932 "
<Odd John .... 1935
<A Man Divided ....... 1950
<A Modern Theory of Ethics .... 1935?
John
"THE EARTH"
... One night when I had tasted bitterness
I went out on to the hill. Dark heather
checked my feet. Below marched the suburban
street lamps. Windows, their curtains drawn,
were shut eyes, inwardly watching the lives
of dreams. Beyond the seas's level darkness
a lighthouse pulsed. Overhead, obscurity.
I distinguished our own house, our islet
in the tumultuous and bitter currents of
the world. There, for a decade and a half,
we two, so different in quality, had grown
in and in to one another, for mutual
support and nourishment, in intricate symbiosis.
There daily we planned our several undertakings,
and recounted the day's oddities and vexations.
There letters piled up to be answered, socks
to be darned. There the children were born,
those sudden new lives. There, under that
roof, our own two lives, recalcitrant
sometimes to one another, were all the while
thankfully one, one larger, more conscious
life than either alone.
All this, surely, was good. Yet there
was bitterness. And bitterness not only
invaded us from the world; it welled up
also within our own magic circle. For horror
at our futility, at our own unreality, and
not only at the world's delirium, had
driven me out on to the hill.
We were always hurrying from one little
urgent task to another, but the upshot was
unsubstantial. Had we, perhaps, misconceived
our whole existence? Were we, as it were,
living from false premises? And in particular,
this partnership of ours, this seemingly so
well-based fulcrum for activity in the world,
was it after all nothing but a little eddy
of complacent and ingrown domesticity,
ineffectively whirling on the surface of
the great flux, having in itself no depth
of being, and no significance? Had we
perhaps after all deceived ourselves? Behind
those rapt windows did we, like so many
others, indeed live only a dream? In a sick
world even the hale are sick. And we two,
spinning our little life mostly by rote,
seldom with clear cognizance, seldom with
firm intent, were products of a sick world.
Yet this life of our was not all sheer
and barren fantasy. Was it not spun from
the actual fibres of reality, which we
gathered in with all the comings and goings
through our door, all our traffic with
the suburb and the city and with remoter
cities, and with the ends of the earth?
And were we not spinning together an
authentic expression of our own nature?
Did not our life issue daily as more or
less firm threads of active living and
mesh itself into the growing web, the
intricate, ever-proliferating pattern of
mankind?
I considered "us" with quiet interest
and a kind of amused awe. How could I
describe our relationship even to myself
without either disparaging it or insulting
it with the tawdry decoration of sentimentality?
For this our delicate balance of dependence
and independence, this coolly critical,
shrewdly ridiculing, but loving mutual
contact, was surely a microcosm of true
community, was after all in its simple
style an actual and living example of that
high goal which the world seeks.
The whole world? The whole universe?
Overheard, obscurity unveiled a star. One
tremulous arrow of light, projected how
many thousands of years ago, now stung
my nerves with vision, and my heart with
fear. For in such a universe as this
what significance could there be in our
fortuitous, our frail, our evanescent community?
But now irrationally I was seized with a
strange worship, not, surely of the star,
that mere furnace which mere distance
falsely sanctified, but of something other,
which the dire contrast of the star and
us signified to the heart. Yet what, what
could thus be signified? Intellect, peering
beyond the star, discovered no Star Maker,
but only darkness; no Love, no Power even,
but only Nothing. And yet the heart praised.
- Olaf Stapledon [From Starmaker]
--------------------
---------------------------------
Sponsored Link
Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $310,000 Mortgage for $999/mo - Calculate new house payment
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application