Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00675)

Dear Rodolfo,

Forgive me if I gave the impression that I was accusing you of 
anything. That was not my intention. I was trying to offer a point of 
view about bigotry itself, and had no intention of applying the word 
to you or anyone else. Perhaps we agree that theosophy does not 
support bigotry. It seems useful to represent the theosophical view 
when there are comments that belong to some other kind of thinking. 

Adelasie

On 11 Nov 2006 at 7:01, Rodolfo Don wrote:

> Hi Adelasie,
> 
> I did not break any rule of Universal Brotherhood when I responded to  
> Jake's first message. It wasn't me who was denying the right to be a  
> sexually accepted being to anyone or to any group. It was Jake. In my  
> response to him I only quoted Theosophical principles, to prove to  
> him that he was wrong.
> 
> I don't understand why you mention to me about bigotry and hatred.  
> Look at my first response to him and tell me where did I break any  
> rule against Universal Brotherhood. And then read Jake's message with  
> the same judging eyes as you read mine.
> 
> Fraternally,
> 
> Rodolfo Don
> 
> On Nov 11, 2006, at 6:33 AM, adelasie wrote:
> 
> > Hi Rodolfo,
> >
> > It's useful to remember karma and reincarnation when we are
> > expressing bigotry and hatred in a theosophical forum. According to
> > the teachings, each entity incarnates in all conditions in order to
> > learn all there is to learn. So we may expect, if we find some one or
> > other of the human conditions to be personally repulsive, that we
> > will one day find oursleves in that very condition. Wisdom is not
> > based on separatism. It is based on the consciousness of unity.
> > Acceptance is a good tool to cultivate in one's own consciousness.
> >
> > Adelasie
>