Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00169)

Gregory,

Thanks. 

1) You are not obliged to any secrecy,  and you might have seen by now that I have respect for your researches. 

2)  I haven't seen you quoting any real document coming from any inner school related to the ULT. 

Besides, Gregory, you say: 

 " You complain that people (like me) make statements without providing evidence. I then suggest how  evidence might be obtained, and you claim this would violate the privacy of the organizations concerned!"  

My comments:

"Not at all!  I did not complain.  I just pointed out you do not have shown any real bibliographical sources. You can write whatever you want; yet I can say your sources do not seem to be real, or accurate, since they don't exist bibliographically."

Is that clear now?  "Pointing  out" is different from "complaining". 

In another message, Gregory, I said you can see by my messages here I rarely discuss the Adyar ES, and when I do so this is done with respect, in spite of all the limitations which I think I see in it.  

So it is not that "everything can be published about Adyar and nothing about the ULT". The dividing line for me is that esoteric shools (in Adyar or elsewhere) are quite different from rites and ritualisms...  

Consider that HPB did create an ES, while she  stated and showed  that Masonry has been widely  infiltrated by the Jesuits,  centuries ago.

Can you see the difference now?   I hope so.  I hope that this may help with another perspective of things.   


Regards,  Carlos. 



 





De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Fri, 3 Nov 2006 12:36:46 +1100 (EST)

Assunto:Theos-World Carlos and Privacy

> I have no problems at all with the concept of privacy....or private or
> even secret organizations. If people wish to associate for secret, lawful
> purposes I am not bothered at all. But their wish for secrecy imposes no
> obligations on me!
> 
> Carlos is apparently quite happy for anything about the ER to be published
> (regardless of the wishes of its members), but not for equivalent material
> to appear about the DES.
> 
> The DES (assuming it exists) may not want me or anyone else mentioning it,
> let alone publishing its materials.
> 
> However, Carlos, you can't have it both ways. You complain that people
> (like me) make statements without providing evidence. I then suggest how
> evidence might be obtained, and you claim this would violate the privacy
> of the organizations concerned!
> So - you either accept that scholars and other commentators who are denied
> access to sources or information about organizations will be left to
> engage in speculation without evidence, or you provide information and
> give access to sources.
> 
> I assume, by the way, that the companies owning ULT property are not
> secret organizations, but corporations subject to law.
> 
> Dr Gregory Tillett
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162518485.276330.9339.tulear.hst.terra.com.br,4948,Des15,Des15
> 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 02/11/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4887
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]