Theos-Talk Archives (October 2006 Message tt00523)

Chuck!

I didn't say anything about that "personalities" should matter. For 
me, the question about succeeding is stupid, hence I can't see that 
anyone could succeed nether Blavatsky, nor Judge, in occult matters 
as Teachers (in till the next Messenger from the Lodge, of curse). 
As Leader/President of the T.S. is it something else. My point was 
as I wrote; "which was faithful, to the real and true impulse of the 
Masters after W.Q.J. past away, and followed the True Theosophical 
Path", instead of only discus on what his or hers claims was based 
on (right or wrong). In other words, where do we find or found this 
after W.Q.J. death. Which Theosophical group/succeeder as "leader" 
(I don't mean this in a Pasadena terminological way) was actually 
true to the Holy Cause? Mrs. Tingley, Mr. Crosbie and Mr. Hargrove 
were al, more or less, claiming to succeed Mr. Judge in some way. 
Mrs. Tingley claimed to be it occult (as Teacher), and Mr. Crosbie 
and Mr. Hargrove to be the "visible head" of the true Third Section 
(and Second Section in Crosbie's case also, if Mr. Hargrove hade any 
claims in this matter I do not know for sure) and the/an agent of 
the Master.

We need Theosophical organizations, in some way for many reasons. 
Then, as well as today. And we need Theosophical organizations which 
are faithful to the real and true impulse of the Masters (the Cause, 
the Doctrines and Teachings and so on), and who follows the True 
Theosophical Path.

And Chuck! You are on this "mailing list" also, so that most include 
you to!? 

Carl

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Drpsionic@... wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 10/31/2006 4:14:59 AM Central Standard Time,  
> carl.ek@... writes:
> 
> Do any  serious Theosophist or Student of Theosophy really thinks 
that 
> anyone  could, what so ever, succeed Blavatsky or Judge? Isn't the 
> question, which  was faithful, to the real and true impulse of the 
> Masters after W.Q.J.  past away, and followed the True 
Theosophical 
> Path? So was it Mrs. Tingley  or Mr. Crosbie, or even Mr. 
Hargrove? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I don't see why it would even matter.  Theosophy is not about the  
> personalities but about the ideas.
>  
> Other than the folks on these mailing lists, no one cares.
>  
> Chuck the Heretic
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>