Theos-Talk Archives (October 2006 Message tt00281)

Man who always insist on proofs by dualistic logic based on initial assumptions that, in turn, man has obtained by way of even earlier initial assumptions based on even earlier ones (initial assumptions, ie) of various even earlier mans' interpretations based on even earlier initial assumptions, etc, etc (are there any other kinds of dualistic---not to mention multiplistic---logic?) ... so man like that ... and I think I'm especially referring to man (or mans, if you prefer?) who interprets esoteric/y topics (not that I'm necessarily excluding all other kinds of topics, if you were wondering), seems to me that man like that, or some man like that, maybe ... (not that I'm excluding all other kinds of people here, incidentally---need I add ...) might occasionally have some trouble sort of reading between ... er, some lines or something, maybe, in some cases, I think or tend to suspect.  Not that one man's trouble might not always be another man's wisdom or something, in some cases, maybe, on the other hand---or is it the other way around, in some cases?   

Amnomynous

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]