Theos-Talk Archives (October 2006 Message tt00011)

Jake and his "Maybe" This & "Maybe" That Speculation:  
Part 1
======================================

I wrote:

"Furthermore, why would Judge (after HPB's death) include portions 
of this KH Concentration letter in E.S. Instruction #5?"

In his latest reply at  
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/36217
Jake comments:

"This was also the LAST ES instruction sent out, and the lowest in 
quality. Maybe it was the Last because mistakes were made or 
doubtful material used, and it was relized that they could no longer 
be issued reliably.  Maybe whoever was typing up the Instruction 
inserted material (the short section containing the phoney adept 
letter could be removed without destroying the context, and the 
whole Instruction would be in a more consistent 'tone.')"

Almost a month ago on Theos-Talk (Sept. 2) Jake also wrote about 
this ES Instruction 5 and at that time he speculated about the 
specific KH Concentration letter somehow "slipping in" or 
being "inserted" into Instruction 5.  

In that posting, Jake wrote:

"Things do 'slip in' and slip by, especially with someone who was 
under the pressures that Judge was.... Was this 
instruction 'recalled' ?  Someone sent me a copy of the original 
mimeograph of Garrangues 'Point Out the Way,' and I swear the typist 
inserted some phoney stuff in it in a few places, as out of 
character with the rest of the book."

"Regardless, even if it is something that did not slip by, and Judge 
consciously and purposively put it [the KH Concentration letter] in 
the instruction, I - for  myself - do not agree with or accept it as 
written, and I don't care  if Judge wrote it or not. I've got that 
right I think???...."

Quoted from:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/35686

In Part 2, I will comment on Jake's "maybes".

Daniel
http://hpb.cc