theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

PEACE AND ETHICS

Aug 01, 2006 05:59 AM
by carlosaveline


Bruce, Dallas, 

Excellent, insightful text by Bruce  below. 

Also, Peace cannot be separated from Ethics and Justice. Different names for the same essential thing.

Best regards,  Carlos. 

De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:"AAA-Dal" dalval14@earthlink.net

Cópia:

Data:Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:17:42 -0700

Assunto:Theos-World RE: History vs. Moral Injustice

> Excellent thoughts and a very good list. Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> Dallas
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert_B_Macdonald
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 
> 
> To: 
> Subject: HISTORY VS. MORAL INJUSTICE
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Friends,
> 
> War seems to be the passtime of our Age. Battles are being fought on
> every front. The battles on the pages of Theos-Talk are a microcosm to
> the battles being fought with bullets and bombs elsewhere in the world
> today. Perhaps if we could find a way of establishing a Peace within
> our own Society, we might see how such a methodology might be esablished
> elsewhere.
> 
> It is always good to begin with what you can agree on. The following
> are a set of axioms that I hope that all members of the Theosophical
> Movement might agree on:
> 
> 
> 1. The truth that the Theosophical Movement (tTM) has no dogmas.
> 
> 
> 2. The truth that the TM puts truth above all.
> 
> 
> 3. The truth that the TM encourages Universal Brotherhood as a means to self
> growth.
> 
> 
> 4. The truth that the TM encourages the study of Comparative Religion,
> Science, and Philosophy as well as the study of the Laws of Nature and
> Powers latent in Man as a means to self growth.
> 
> 
> 5. The truth that HPB, WQJ, and the Masters produced a body of work that
> provides a particular vocabulary for use in the Movement.
> 
> 
> 6. The truth that the Movement's only reason for being is for its own
> propogation with the understanding that a search for truth and a
> practice of Universal Brotherhood as advanced by the Movement will make
> Humanity nobler.
> 
> 
> 7. The truth that all members of the Movement are beholden to protect
> the Movement and further its interests to the best of their abilities.
> 
> 
> The THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT must be distinquished from theosophy in general.
> There can be theosophists who practice theosophy in its general sense who
> have never heard of the Movement or its founders.
> 
> Just because the writings of HPB, WQJ and the Masters provide the
> foundation for discussion within the Movement does not mean there are
> not other or even theosophically nobler writers. 
> 
> All that is meant here is that we have to have a common foundation for 
> 
> discussion and because of the axioms of the Society that foundation 
> 
> must be the founders for nobody has the authority to provide any better. 
> 
> This is due to axiom 1.
> 
> Here then is the argument that flows from the above axioms. When Olcott
> accused HPB of using the authority of the Masters to lend credence to
> her opinions as found in the "Prayag Letter", Olcott should have been
> ruled out of order according to Axiom 1. His allegation was not
> provable so the only reason the members had for agreeing with him at
> that time is because they viewed him as an authority on HPB and her
> writings. This was in direct oposition to Axiom 1 and consequently
> Axiom 7 (through their ignorance). 
> 
> Besant committed the same error when she accused Judge. 
> 
> Even, if as she says, the Masters put her up to
> it, this would be a case of making the Masters the Authority, and
> thereby introducing dogma into the Movement. True Masters would have
> realised this and not have done it, and if they did it was Besant's duty
> to argue against such a course as she had no way of independantly
> proving it. What if in either case the Masters had provided testimony
> by letter. Such testimony would be believed by some, regarded as fraud
> by others. In other words it would have been evidence but not proof as
> there would be no way to ultimately verify the letters. The only
> verification for each theosophist is his own conscience.
> 
> If you believed Besant and or Olcott, you could be accused of creating
> authorities and destroying the Movement as founded by HPB and the
> Masters. If you tried to argue that HPB and Judge must be put above all
> else, again you are creating authorites. Members of the Theosophical
> Society should have ruled Besant and Olcott out of order not because
> they were right or wrong, that is irrelevant. 
> 
> They should have been
> ruled out of order because they undermined the Axioms of the Society
> that they were supposed to uphold, thereby paving the way for dogmas to
> be introduced into the Movement. The members who did not understand
> this are the ones who destroyed the Society by splitting one way or the
> other. 
> 
> The battles being fought on the pages of Theos-Talk are not
> historical battles, they are moral battles. THERE ARE NO GOOD REASONS
> TO LEVEL UNPROVABLE PERSONAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ANOTHER THEOSOPHIST. 
> 
> 
> There is nothing to be won as there are no dogmas at stake, only the
> axioms that the THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT was founded upon.
> 
> This is a logical analysis of the splitting of the Movement. Most of
> the axioms did not have to be used in this analysis althought they might
> be valuable in determining where to go from here. Any comments on the
> analysis itself or on the axioms are welcome. Any personal attacks will
> be viewed as coming from the typical type of agitators that infiltrate
> all groups for the purpose of destruction. When you can't argue
> logically, smear your opponents (something the Movement was created to
> prevent).
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1154389112.893012.32500.morondava.hst.terra.com.br,8425,Des15,Des15
> 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 31/07/2006 / Vers?o: 4.4.00/4818
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application