Theos-Talk Archives (July 2006 Message tt00566)

Let's try that again.  Sorry Dallas.

> Daniel,
> 
> I love the way you "claim" never to know what any historical personage
> is thinking or doing!!  Yet you certainly construct your quotes like
> you are trying to make a point!  Perhaps if you explained your points
> people would not be left having to guess what you are thinking or
> doing!!!  Your only explanations seem to be in the criticism of other
> people's opinions.  In your code of ethics it seems to be a moral
> imperative to stand nowhere and criticize all.
> 
> Jesus X 2!
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell"
> <danielhcaldwell@> wrote:
> >
> > Bruce,
> > 
> > I love the way you know exactly what I was or wasn't thinking or 
> > doing!!
> > 
> > Take this gem of yours:
> > 
> > =========================================================
> > Daniel has baited Dallas into commenting on an historical matter by
> > again first trying to deceive readers through lack of context. Rather
> > than demonstrate to readers why Dallas is wrong in his analysis, 
> > Daniel might demonstrate some courage and present his own 
> > convictions to the readers. It is rather cowardly sitting in the 
> > weeds constantly floating decoys and then blasting anyone who cares 
> > to investigate. Clever but
> > cowardly.
> > =========================================================
> > 
> > When I wrote my posting titled "Robert Crosbie Claimed" I wasn't
> > even thinking about Dallas!!  I had been discussing the use of 
> > the word "claim" with Carlos.  So I simply decided to present
> > to Carlos a series of statements showing what Crosby claimed.
> > 
> > So now you say I was baiting Dallas?
> > 
> > But of course you know better than myself what I was or wasn't 
> > thinking or doing.
> > 
> > Bruce, is this in your code of Theosophical ethics to accuse people 
> > of what you don't have the foggiest idea about?
> > 
> > Jesus!  
> > 
> > Daniel
> >
>