Theos-Talk Archives (July 2006 Message tt00565)

Dallas,

I love the way you "claim" never to know what any historical personage
is thinking or doing!!  Yet you certainly construct your quotes like
you are trying to make a point!  Perhaps if you explained your points
people would not be left having to guess what you are thinking or
doing!!!  Your only explanations seem to be in the criticism of other
people's opinions.  In your code of ethics it seems to be a moral
imperative to stand nowhere and criticize all.

Jesus X 2!

Bruce



--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell"
<danielhcaldwell@...> wrote:
>
> Bruce,
> 
> I love the way you know exactly what I was or wasn't thinking or 
> doing!!
> 
> Take this gem of yours:
> 
> =========================================================
> Daniel has baited Dallas into commenting on an historical matter by
> again first trying to deceive readers through lack of context. Rather
> than demonstrate to readers why Dallas is wrong in his analysis, 
> Daniel might demonstrate some courage and present his own 
> convictions to the readers. It is rather cowardly sitting in the 
> weeds constantly floating decoys and then blasting anyone who cares 
> to investigate. Clever but
> cowardly.
> =========================================================
> 
> When I wrote my posting titled "Robert Crosbie Claimed" I wasn't
> even thinking about Dallas!!  I had been discussing the use of 
> the word "claim" with Carlos.  So I simply decided to present
> to Carlos a series of statements showing what Crosby claimed.
> 
> So now you say I was baiting Dallas?
> 
> But of course you know better than myself what I was or wasn't 
> thinking or doing.
> 
> Bruce, is this in your code of Theosophical ethics to accuse people 
> of what you don't have the foggiest idea about?
> 
> Jesus!  
> 
> Daniel
>