Theos-Talk Archives (July 2006 Message tt00502)

Friends, 

HPB did not claim, she did not assert. She made phenomena and dozens of persons who saw them gave their public testimonies. Apart from phenomena, dozens of theosophists had their own independent evidences that they were chelas and lay chelas of various Mahatmas. 


So to say of that period (1875-1891) that "HPB claimed SHE was in contact with the Masters" is a shameful  LIE if the statement comes from anyone who studied the History of the Movement. 


It is not a question of "believing". 

It is a question of recognizing the fact the there are hundreds of evidences about Masters in those years. 


Regards, Carlos. 


De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:09:59 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Re: "HPB'S CLAIMS"

> The word "claim" here is used in a very neutral
> way. 
> 
> One could say:
> 
> HPB claimed or maintained or asserted...
> 
> I personally think there is an abundant amount of evidence that
> her claims, her assertions were completely justified and true. 
> 
> For example, it seems to me that the testimony of H.S. Olcott as to 
> the existence of HPB's Master shows that HPB's claims or assertions 
> were true and factual:
> 
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/olcottandmahatmas.htm
> 
> Witness the testimony of others who gave evidence of the existence
> of her teachers:
> 
> A Casebook of Encounters with the Theosophical Mahatmas
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/mastersencounterswith.htm
> 
> In summary: I personally believe in the existence of HPB's
> Teachers. 
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
> 
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]