theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

DANIEL'S DIFFICULTY TO UNDERSTAND

Jul 05, 2006 11:48 AM
by carlosaveline


Daniel,

It means, as you said earlier, that the SPR has had no "official" or "formal" position with regard to HPB.  

Hence its slanders against HPB were "unofficial" or "informal", and then, in 1986, they were informally withdrawn.  

Got it now? 


Regards,  Carlos Cardoso Aveline . 

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Wed, 05 Jul 2006 18:36:02 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World ;) ;) Re: INFORMAL CHARGES WERE INFORMALLY ABANDONED

> Maybe somebody can tell me what Carlos is really
> talking about [see below]. ;)
> 
> Informal? What does this actually mean in this context?
> 
> So the SPR "informally" brought charges against her? ;)
> 
> When? 
> 
> And when did they "informally" withdraw the charges?? ;)
> 
> I didn't know that Vernon Harrison was ACTUALLY "informally" 
> withdrawing ON BEHALF of the SPR the "informal" charges that
> had been previously [informally!] made!!
> 
> Well, Carlos, maybe next time you announce these things you will
> be sure to include the word "informal" at the appropriate
> places.
> 
> Sorry, but your words appear to me to be simply doubletalk.
> Something a New Ager might say! Sorry if there are any
> New Agers here! :)
> 
> My advice to interested readers:
> 
> If you are at all interested in determining the validity or
> not of the Hodgson Report, read and study it for yourself
> and also read and compare it with the various critiques by
> Harrison, Carrithers, Vania, Hastings, Besant, Kingsland, etc.
> 
> Of course the easier way [the lazy man approach??] is to let some 
> one else do your homework and thinking for you and just accept [for 
> example, Aveline's contention] that the SPR [informally, of course!] 
> withdrew the Hodgson Report and its charges against HPB, therefore 
> we can conclude [formally or informally??? which is it???] that 
> there is no substance to the charges, etc. etc.
> 
> Is this like the priest that tells the congregation: "Don't read 
> the Bible for yourself, I'm here to tell you what it really means"?
> 
> Informally, of course.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > INFORMAL CHARGES CAN ONLY BE INFORMALLY ABANDONED 
> > 
> > 
> > Daniel,
> > 
> > All this (see below) is well-known.
> > 
> > The SPR as such, formally never comdemned HPB as a fraud; nor has 
> it made any fraud charges against her; so both the charges against 
> HPB and their removal were and had to be INFORMAL.
> > 
> > The informal charges and slanders could only be informally 
> abandoned and withdrawn in 1986. 
> > 
> > 
> > Got is now?
> > 
> > Slanderers use to ignore that fact that SPR cease to accuse HPB of 
> fraud. 
> > 
> > It is a non-scholar, funny trick to say that the charges "were 
> only informally dropped" , forgetting that also the charges were but 
> informal.
> > 
> > Informal, yet effective, both the charges and their withdrawal. 
> > 
> > Except,perhaps, for the 21st century Soloviof/Coulombs apostles. 
> > 
> > 
> > Best regards, Carlos Cardoso Aveline 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1152124578.205016.31699.vacoas.hst.terra.com.br,5611,Des15,Des15
> 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/07/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4800
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application