On Answering to Daniel
May 09, 2006 07:15 AM
by carlosaveline
Daniel,
Thanks for your questions.
Yet I have to confess that all of them have been answered already since February, here at Theos-talk.
Regards, Carlos.
De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Cópia:
Data:Mon, 08 May 2006 19:20:38 -0000
Assunto:Theos-World Trying to Understand Carlos' Use of the word "slanderer"
> Trying to Understand Carlos' Use of the word "slanderer"
>
> Carlos,
>
> You comment:
>
> =========================================================
> So if Daniel, Katinka, Algeo, P. Johnson and others want to look
> like scholars, they must first of all examine their sources, then
> admit that V. Soloviof, Eleanor Sidgwick and Alexis/Emma Coulombs
> are all liars, and finally start to stick to facts. Three good
> examples these people could follow are Leslie Price, Michael Gomes
> and Ernest Pelletier -- who have different positions/opinions, but
> all respect facts and examine their own sources.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/32948
> =========================================================
>
>
> Carlos, you also say quite emphatically:
>
> ======================================================
> Why should anyone except a slanderer consider Soloviof a legitimate
> source of historical information? But -- why using Soloviof as a
> source if you are not a slanderer?
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/32946
> ==========================================================
>
> Carlos, let me try now to understand your position here.
>
> Are you actually saying that if a writer uses any material from
> Soloviof's book as "a legitimate source of historical information",
> then you would consider him or her as a "slanderer"?
>
> Let me try to give a specific example or two, so that there is no
> room for misunderstanding your position as given in the above two
> quotations of yours.
>
> Since you mention me in the first quote above, let us suppose, I
> have written an article or maybe even a chapter for a possible book
> on HPB and Theosophy and in the course of my narrative, I write:
>
> ===================================================
> In the latter part of 1877, H.P.B. told others that she was planning
> to go to the East. She wrote to a Russian correspondent Mr. Aksakov:
>
> "We have now a multitude of corresponding fellows in India, and are
> proposing next year to set off for Ceylon and to settle there, as
> headquarters of our society." (A Modern Priestess of Isis, p. 277.)
>
> ==================================================
>
> Now here I believe I would be --- by your own definition ---
> using Soloviof's book as "a legitimate source of historical
> information."
>
> Right?
>
> Would you therefore say that I am a "slanderer"?
>
> And furthermore if I don't mention to the reader that this is a
> possibly forged letter or in fact a forged letter, that is, not an
> authentic letter of H.P.B., would I then be compounding the "crime"
> even more???
>
> Again, would you say that I am a "slanderer"?
>
> Or let us suppose that in my essay or book I wrote:
>
> ===================================================
> H.P.B. writes about her first book ISIS UNVEILED as follows:
>
> "Well, my book has appeared at last. My darling was born last
> Saturday, September 29th, but a week ealier my publisher had sent
> pre-publication copies to the editors of all the papers. I am
> enclosing herewith the review in the New York Herald...." (letter
> by H.P.B. to N.A. Aksakov from V.S. Solovyov's A Modern Priestess of
> Isis (London, 1895).
>
> ==================================================
>
> Am I a "slanderer", Carlos, by YOUR OWN definition by using
> Soloviof's book in this example as "a legitimate source of
> historical information."?
>
> I am trying to understand your reasoning here and I hope these two
> examples may help to clarify the points that you are trying to
> convey to readers on Theos-Talk.
>
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1147116060.341108.2131.arrino.terra.com.br,6726,Des15,Des15
>
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/05/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4757
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application