Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt01157)

Carlos-

Now that we have the orthodox definition of what a 'heretic' is, 
what then is the heretical definition of the word 'orthodox'?

Vince

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva <silva_cass@...> wrote:
>
> By definition, orthodox and heretic in the same sentence becomes 
an oxymoron
> Cass
> 
> carlosaveline cardoso aveline <carlosaveline@...> wrote: 
> 
> Dear Friends,
> 
> 
> But this is only the standard, or ortodox definition of a Heretics.
> 
> Carlos.
> 
> 
> >From: Drpsionic@...
> >Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> >To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Hi there, I'm Vince and I am new to 
the group
> >Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:00:45 EST
> >
> >
> >In a message dated 3/20/2006 7:17:03 AM Central Standard Time,
> >vblaz2004@... writes:
> >
> >Thanks  for the welcome.  May I ask what constitutes a heretic, 
and
> >by what  standards?
> >
> >
> >
> >It's a pretty conventional definition, one who rejects orthodoxy, 
no matter
> >what that form that orthodoxy may take.  Or to put it even more 
bluntly, a
> >person who prefers his own path to that dictated by others.
> >
> >Chuck the Heretic
> >
> >
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> COPA 2006: Enfeite o seu MSN Messenger de verde e amarelo! 
> http://copa.br.msn.com/extra/emoticons/
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> ---------------------------------
> Brings words and photos together (easily) with
>  PhotoMail  - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>