Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt01134)

By definition, orthodox and heretic in the same sentence becomes an oxymoron
Cass

carlosaveline cardoso aveline <carlosaveline@hotmail.com> wrote: 

Dear Friends,


But this is only the standard, or ortodox definition of a Heretics.

Carlos.


>From: Drpsionic@aol.com
>Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Hi there, I'm Vince and I am new to the group
>Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:00:45 EST
>
>
>In a message dated 3/20/2006 7:17:03 AM Central Standard Time,
>vblaz2004@sbcglobal.net writes:
>
>Thanks  for the welcome.  May I ask what constitutes a heretic, and
>by what  standards?
>
>
>
>It's a pretty conventional definition, one who rejects orthodoxy, no matter
>what that form that orthodoxy may take.  Or to put it even more bluntly, a
>person who prefers his own path to that dictated by others.
>
>Chuck the Heretic
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
COPA 2006: Enfeite o seu MSN Messenger de verde e amarelo! 
http://copa.br.msn.com/extra/emoticons/



 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 




		
---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
 PhotoMail  - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]