Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00731)

Bart -- I'm sure you aren't brow beating me, as you indicated a 
while back.

If you look at the first post on this topic, I indicated only that 
Tacoma had answered the TSA's Complaint and requested that TSA pay 
court and legal costs.  That was an announcement to let theosophists 
(or Theosophists) know the suit existed and was in process in the 
judicial system.

I then responded to your many questions and stated, as well, that 
the court would rule on the merits of the case.  I cannot say much 
more about the facts of the case until litigation is complete. 

Best regards,
Krsanna


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Bart Lidofsky <bartl@...> wrote:
>
> krsanna wrote:
> > Why do you refuse to let the court review the case before you 
leap 
> > to conclusions about either party?  What is it that makes your 
> > emotional attachment and opinion more important that the court?
> 
> 	Hey, I wasn't the one who started posting messages about the 
terrible 
> things the TSA was doing to the Tacoma Lodge on this list. But 
once 
> people started posting, I figured that they understood the 
situation. 
> I'm sorry if I was incorrect.
> 
> > Do you not understand the protocols of litigation?  The facts of 
the 
> > case are best not discussed with anyone but attorneys and courts.
> 
> 	Then why were they being posted on this list in the first 
place?
> 
> 	Bart
>