Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00165)

Leonardo,


Suspicions about Daniel are not personal.

They have been circulating for some years among experienced theosophists and 
 none of them, as long as I know, doubted the theory according to which  
Daniel  has been inventing false persons for his own reasons and motives, 
especially  to help himself attack some theosophical blanks.

Now he has the opportunity  to  answer to such a general evaluation about 
him.

Regards,  Carlos.


> From: leonmaurer@aol.com
> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Impersonal Suspicions on Daniel
> Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 00:26:51 EST
>
> Carlos,
>
> Your letter is just some more nonsensical excuses about your endless gossip
> that has noting to do with theosophy. Nor does it answer the more important
> questions raised by my letter.
>
> You are the one who is doing it, and you are personally responsible for 
> these
> continuing public accusations criminalizing another person's rights --
> whether they be for anonymity, actions or opinions you don't like, or 
> silence in the
> face of your groundless gossip... All of it based on hearsay and other non
> evidence, that you, personally, intend everyone to overhear.
>
> If this endless and repetitive barrage accusing other people by innuendo 
> and
> insinuation isn't personal, then what is?
>
> All of what you write against others with such an obvious personal pique,
> indicates that (besides being plain gossip which HPB abhorred) you put
> personality before brotherhood -- which is as far from theosophical as 
> anyone can get.
>
> So, give it up, brother... You are merely adding food to the fire that 
> paints
> you out as a troll, and a busybody, as well as a disrupter of this
> theosophical forum...
>
> Besides just becoming tiresome beyond belief, we might all wonder for what
> personal purpose this emotionally tinged "stoking" is being done?
>
> Leonardo
>
> In a message dated 3/1/06 11:52:45 AM, carlosaveline@hotmail.com writes:
>
>
> >
> > Leonardo,
> >
>
> > I only now see your posting below.
> >
> > I have the time to tell you one thing.
> >
> > Suspicions about Daniel are not personal.
> >
> > They have been circulating for some years among experienced theosophists 
> and
> > none of them, as long as I know, doubted the theory according to which
> > Daniel
> > has been inventing false persons for his own reasons and motives, 
> especially
> > to help himself attack some theosophical blanks.  Now he has the 
> opportunity
> > to 
> > answer to such a general evaluation about him.
> >
> > Regards,  Carlos.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: leonmaurer@aol.com
> > >Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > >Subject: Re: Theos-World Did Daniel Committ Fraud?
> > >Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:27:13 EST
> > >
> > >
> > >In a message dated 2/25/06 10:27:48 AM, carlosaveline@hotmail.com 
> writes:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear Friends,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I am getting really curious about all of this.
> > > >
> > > > A lawsuit against Paul?  It might be most unlikely.
> > > >
> > > > Why not such a sub-threat as a way to try to bully people
> > psychologically?
> > > >
> > > > You can bully some people all the time, you can bully all people for
> > > > some time, but you cannot bully all people all the time.
> > > >
> > > > And I am still waiting for Danniel's clarifications. Maybe he is
> > > > innocent?
> > > >
> > > > Really curious as Ethics is of the essence for us.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,  Carlos.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >So you say...
> > >
> > >And, how ethical is your continued hounding of Caldwell through not so
> > >subtle accusative implications of his guilt by means of subtly sly 
> reverse
> > >innuendo's (not to mention your repetitive subject lines with his name
> > >constantly being impugned) whenever you see an opportunity? 
> > >  He may be innocent as you say,and undeserving of such treatment...
> > >But in such a case, you certainly would not be in the eyes of any
> > perceptive
> > >theosophist on this list.
> > >
> > >What you are doing by such widespread and repetitive public disclosure 
> of a
> > >personal suspicion so as to influence the thoughts of others -- you 
> call
> > >"friends" (but whom are not necessarily so) -- appears to this observer 
> to
> > >be highly unethical, from both a legal and a theosophical point of 
> view.
> > >
> > >In addition, passing the libel and slander buck back to Paul, as well 
> as
> > >adding further implications that Caldwell is a bully as well as a 
> fraud,
> > doesn't
> > >appear to be so ethical either... Especially, when you are safe behind 
> a
> > >foreign border.
> > >
> > >In addition, your flooding of this list with your repetitive side 
> issues,
> > has
> > >almost completely shoved the discussion of theosophy into the mud and
> > >covered it over with slime in the form of gossip -- that would, in my 
> view,
> >
> > >make HPB disown you as her chela (if you ever were or could be one:)
> > >
> > >So far, all you seem to be doing is dominating this theosophical forum 
> and
> > >spreading tension, apprehension, and dissension among its members.   
> (Not
> > >to mention wasting my time reading and responding to your overly 
> repetitive
> > >and boring letters whenever they go beyond the boundaries of 
> theosophically
> > >useful or interesting information.)   Stating your opinions about long 
> dead
> >
> > >teachers or members of this forum once -- is enough.
> > >
> > >Leonardo
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
_________________________________________________________________
Copa 2006: Sabe como se diz ‘pênalti’ em alemão? Clique aqui! 
http://copa.br.msn.com/extra/dicionario/l-z/