Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00014)

Leonardo,

I only now see your posting below.

I have the time to tell you one thing.

Suspicions about Daniel are not personal.

They have been circulating for some years among experienced theosophists and
none of them, as long as I know, doubted the theory according to which 
Daniel
has been inventing false persons for his own reasons and motives, especially 
to help
himself attack some theosophical blanks.  Now he has the opportunity to  
answer
to such a general evaluation about him.

Regards,  Carlos.








> From: leonmaurer@aol.com
> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Did Daniel Committ Fraud?
> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:27:13 EST
>
>
> In a message dated 2/25/06 10:27:48 AM, carlosaveline@hotmail.com writes:
>
> >
> > Dear Friends,
> >
> >
> > Yes, I am getting really curious about all of this.
> >
> > A lawsuit against Paul?  It might be most unlikely.
> >
> > Why not such a sub-threat as a way to try to bully people 
> psychologically?
> >
> > You can bully some people all the time, you can bully all people for
> > some time, but you cannot bully all people all the time.
> >
> > And I am still waiting for Danniel's clarifications. Maybe he is
> > innocent?
> >
> > Really curious as Ethics is of the essence for us.
> >
> > Best regards,  Carlos.
> >
> >
> So you say...
>
> And, how ethical is your continued hounding of Caldwell through not so 
> subtle
> accusative implications of his guilt by means of subtly sly reverse
> innuendo's (not to mention your repetitive subject lines with his name 
> constantly being
> impugned) whenever you see an opportunity?   He may be innocent as you say,
> and undeserving of such treatment... But in such a case, you certainly 
> would
> not be in the eyes of any perceptive theosophist on this list.
>
> What you are doing by such widespread and repetitive public disclosure of a
> personal suspicion so as to influence the thoughts of others -- you call
> "friends" (but whom are not necessarily so) -- appears to this observer to 
> be highly
> unethical, from both a legal and a theosophical point of view.
>
> In addition, passing the libel and slander buck back to Paul, as well as
> adding further implications that Caldwell is a bully as well as a fraud, 
> doesn't
> appear to be so ethical either... Especially, when you are safe behind a
> foreign border.
>
> In addition, your flooding of this list with your repetitive side issues, 
> has
> almost completely shoved the discussion of theosophy into the mud and 
> covered
> it over with slime in the form of gossip -- that would, in my view, make 
> HPB
> disown you as her chela (if you ever were or could be one:)
>
> So far, all you seem to be doing is dominating this theosophical forum and
> spreading tension, apprehension, and dissension among its members.   (Not 
> to
> mention wasting my time reading and responding to your overly repetitive 
> and
> boring letters whenever they go beyond the boundaries of theosophically 
> useful or
> interesting information.)   Stating your opinions about long dead teachers 
> or
> members of this forum once -- is enough.
>
> Leonardo
>
> >
> > >From: Bill Meredith <meredith_bill@earthlink.net>
> > >Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > >To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > >Subject: Re: Theos-World Did Daniel Create False Persons?
> > >Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:06:12 -0500
> > >
> > >LOL John,  I think your last sentence might also accurately convey the
> > >inquiring attitude of those who have raised the question of whether
> > >Daniel and David are one and the same.  "I don't really know if that is
> > >what Daniel is doing but I wouldn't be a bit surprised, lol."
> > >
> > >  I googled for some information on the formal court case  you 
> reference
> > >below and came up empty handed.  Still googling is a learned skill
> > >which I have not mastered, so maybe you could send me the reference, so
> > >I could "compare and contrast" the various points of view in the
> > >specific case to which you are referring.
> > >peace,
> > >
> > >
> > >bill
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >samblo@cs.com wrote:
> > > > bill,
> > > >   I don't necessarily see Daniel's absence as unusual under the
> > circumstance
> > > > of the organized, preconceived, pre-agreed poison pen attack. I 
> rather
> > think
> > > > he is probably having to spend considerable time with his legal 
> consul
> > putting
> > > > together a well prepared brief for a court case. I recall that 
> within
> > the last
> > > > 90 days there was a formal court case here in the USA by a member of
> > another
> > > > Yahoo Group who was subjected to defamation, slander, and libel, 
> that
> > person
> > > > took the parties to court and the court for the first time ruled in
> > favor of
> > > > the plaintiff and set precedence in the award of damages to the 
> yahoo
> > > > Group Member. I don't really know if that is what Daniel is doing 
> but I
> > > > wouldn't be a bit surprised, lol.
> > > >
> > > > John
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
_________________________________________________________________
Facilite sua vida: Use o Windows Desktop Search e encontre qualquer arquivo 
ou e-mail em seu PC. Acesse:  http://desktop.msn.com.br