Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00624)

Dear John,

I have a sincere respect for you viewpoint.

I also happen to believe that truth can only be understood, even partially, 
when looked at from different points of view.

As to the suspitions of fraud possibly made by Daniel, what I believe to be 
significantly damaging to Daniel Caldwell is his silence on the issue

Until recently, Daniel H. Caldwell  had many things to say in Theos-talk.   
But when confronted with Paul's documented view of his possible fraud 
involving the forgery of false persons, Daniel suddenly disappeared.  
Instead of explaining the possible mistakes done by Paul Johnson, Daniel 
just got shy and disappeared. One can only think that Paul is right.


The rumours about Daniel doing such frauds have being circulating for 
several years among long-standing theosolphists.

They had already been unanimously accepted, as long as I know, among  
experienced students from SEVERAL theosophical groups and institutions.

Some three weeks ago, Paul Johnson came to the public with some documented 
texts about this.

It was an important contribution for the clarification of the whole thing. 
It was an opportunity for Daniel to clarify. Yet he got dumb so far.

Perhaps you can help us get to the truth.   I am still waiting for 
clarifications but both time and Daniel's silence seem to work against 
Daniel's innocence.


Best regards,  Carlos.





> From: samblo@cs.com
> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Did Daniel Committ Fraud?
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:15:47 EST
>
> Carlos,
>    I do find the interpretation of my post about taking this issue to 
> court
> as being any form of threat high satire, lol. My view is the court is a 
> proper
> venue to settle this issue between both sides of the topic, not one side, 
> both
> sides. Both sides have equal opportunity before a court not just one side 
> or
> position. A court can settle the issue that apparently disturbs some 
> parties
> posting on this Forum. Paul can take Daniel to court. Daniel can take Paul 
> to
> court. Equal opportunity for all. Where is a threat in stating what is 
> plain to
> any one? I have been here since 1999 and no one has ever seen me make any
> form of threat to any one nor do I ever intend too. From what has been 
> posted by
> the parties that claim Daniel did such and such they seem to indicate that
> they are unable to obtain a "confession" from the person they consider 
> "Guilty"
> before proven innocent. If the proof in their possession is so convincing 
> and
> irrefutable in proving Daniel to have done some dastardly deed then 
> absolutely
> nothing prevents the "injured parties" from taking him to court and proving
> their case and receiving Justice. On the other hand Daniel is availed the 
> same
> access and means. I see the parties on Paul's side saying unless Daniel
> publicly confesses he is "guilty" they have no other means to obtain 
> satisfaction
> except by subjecting over two hundred other members of this Forum to the
> equivalent of an old time western lynch party daily until he submits. This 
> is first
> class "bullying," or at least the attempt at it. That is a false position 
> in my
> view, you or Paul or Jerry or all of you and all other unrevealed 
> interested
> persons involved can and should in my view take it out of this forum and 
> take
> him to court or shut up. I find it ridiculous that this assertion has 
> plagued
> this forum since 1993, 13 years? I have only been here since 1999, lol I 
> didn't
> subscribe to read this garbage every day endlessly, I joined the forum to
> read about what other people knew about H.P.Blavatsky as a person, her 
> works, her
> life, her adventures and experiences and so on. When I joined I had the
> illusion that people would actually actively discuss what she wrote about 
> and
> enlighten others on their insight and knowledge about the contents of her 
> works.
> Don't hold your breath. In the years since 1999 very little of that 
> actually
> happens here to my dismay and sadness, instead partisan lodge wars by 
> football
> fans cheering for their team and team advocacy. I do not nor have I ever
> belonged to any Lodge period, and after 6 years of reading the posts of 
> lodge members
> here I remain certain I made a right decision, lol.
>
>     Alternately nothing is preventing any of you from directly 
> communicating
> with Daniel by letter or phone off this forum, nothing stops you from
> E-mailing Daniel directly off this forum. Jerry told in his recent post he 
> possesses
> all the necessary information to communicate directly with Daniel instead 
> of
> grandstanding here on this forum and subjecting us all to this when I, and 
> I
> have confidence others here would prefer to not be forced to wade through
> additional "developed traffic" of  more posts on this topic Nothing 
> prevents you and
> the others from visiting Daniel in person if he consents so a solution can 
> be
> worked out if possible. Also there could be private "mediators" who, as
> resource could help mediate communication with Daniel, from what I have 
> read here
> you all agree something is missing in effective communication with him, 
> lol.
>
> John
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
_________________________________________________________________
Copa 2006: Já está na hora de saber o que é ‘Freundschaftsspiel’ Clique 
aqui! http://copa.br.msn.com/extra/dicionario/