Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00591)

Carlos,
   I do find the interpretation of my post about taking this issue to court 
as being any form of threat high satire, lol. My view is the court is a proper 
venue to settle this issue between both sides of the topic, not one side, both 
sides. Both sides have equal opportunity before a court not just one side or 
position. A court can settle the issue that apparently disturbs some parties 
posting on this Forum. Paul can take Daniel to court. Daniel can take Paul to 
court. Equal opportunity for all. Where is a threat in stating what is plain to 
any one? I have been here since 1999 and no one has ever seen me make any 
form of threat to any one nor do I ever intend too. From what has been posted by 
the parties that claim Daniel did such and such they seem to indicate that 
they are unable to obtain a "confession" from the person they consider "Guilty" 
before proven innocent. If the proof in their possession is so convincing and 
irrefutable in proving Daniel to have done some dastardly deed then absolutely 
nothing prevents the "injured parties" from taking him to court and proving 
their case and receiving Justice. On the other hand Daniel is availed the same 
access and means. I see the parties on Paul's side saying unless Daniel 
publicly confesses he is "guilty" they have no other means to obtain satisfaction 
except by subjecting over two hundred other members of this Forum to the 
equivalent of an old time western lynch party daily until he submits. This is first 
class "bullying," or at least the attempt at it. That is a false position in my 
view, you or Paul or Jerry or all of you and all other unrevealed interested 
persons involved can and should in my view take it out of this forum and take 
him to court or shut up. I find it ridiculous that this assertion has plagued 
this forum since 1993, 13 years? I have only been here since 1999, lol I didn't 
subscribe to read this garbage every day endlessly, I joined the forum to 
read about what other people knew about H.P.Blavatsky as a person, her works, her 
life, her adventures and experiences and so on. When I joined I had the 
illusion that people would actually actively discuss what she wrote about and 
enlighten others on their insight and knowledge about the contents of her works. 
Don't hold your breath. In the years since 1999 very little of that actually 
happens here to my dismay and sadness, instead partisan lodge wars by football 
fans cheering for their team and team advocacy. I do not nor have I ever 
belonged to any Lodge period, and after 6 years of reading the posts of lodge members 
here I remain certain I made a right decision, lol. 
   
    Alternately nothing is preventing any of you from directly communicating 
with Daniel by letter or phone off this forum, nothing stops you from 
E-mailing Daniel directly off this forum. Jerry told in his recent post he possesses 
all the necessary information to communicate directly with Daniel instead of 
grandstanding here on this forum and subjecting us all to this when I, and I 
have confidence others here would prefer to not be forced to wade through 
additional "developed traffic" of  more posts on this topic Nothing prevents you and 
the others from visiting Daniel in person if he consents so a solution can be 
worked out if possible. Also there could be private "mediators" who, as 
resource could help mediate communication with Daniel, from what I have read here 
you all agree something is missing in effective communication with him, lol.

John


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]