Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00465)

You said it right Bill.   Sorry I didn't see this until after I wrote my very 
polite letter putting Carlos on the peer review stand.   :-) 

Len 

P.S. 
My mailbox still has over 120 unread along with some randomly read letters 
that I have to put aside as unread until I get to them.   As it is, since I got 
out of the hospital, I spend more than 10 hours a day at the computer trying 
to catch up.   But the letters keep piling up at about 30 per day. No telling 
when I'll get through the pile. </X-)>   

In a message dated 2/17/06 12:31:09 PM, meredith_bill@earthlink.net writes:


> 
> carlosaveline cardoso aveline wrote:
> > Dear Bill,
> >
> > My apologies.
> >
> > Sorry, I don't have the time to read you commentaries carefully right now.
> >
> > Busy day.
> >  
> 
> Sorry you did not have time to read my commentaries carefully before
> responding yet again from a position of ignorance.
> 
> > But, do you really  think Paul Johnson has "Revealed the Masters"?
> >
> > Revealed their personal identities??? Understood something of  their
> > teachings?
> >  
> In a word, yes.  When you read the book, you may understand the context
> in which my answer is given, but as one who judges a book by its cover,
> and offers a condemnation of said book based solely on the title, you
> are not one with whom I see much hope for meaningful discussions.
> > According to the Esoteric Philosophy, it takes an Adept to
> > fully understand Adepts.  And those who undertand anything serious sbout
> > them, do NOT "reveal". Have heard about Secrets of Initiation?
> >  
> > Tao Te King:  "Those who talk, don't know; those who know, don't talk".
> >  
> 
> 
> I can only ask you to look back over the past few weeks and take note of
> how much "talking" you have done  on theos-talk.  You came here with an
> agenda to undermine Daniel Caldwell and you have been using Caldwell's
> tactics to achieve your goal.  The implication that you somehow know
> more about the esoteric philosophy and what it really means is
> flapdoodle.   Paul Johnson and others whom you might call naive have
> studied and  synthesized more science, religion and philosophy than you
> even imagine.   The constant theme of your  relentless "talking" is
> evidence that you have not even studied your Self/self enough to
> recognize that  you are a self-centered mass of relationships,
> attachments, and addictions.  You behave in the manner we have come to
> expect from Caldwell.  The two of you are peas from the same pod. 
> Meditate on that.
> 
> 
> peace,
> 
> 
> bill
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]