Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00346)

carlosaveline cardoso aveline wrote:
> Dear Bill,
>
> My apologies.
>
> Sorry, I don't have the time to read you commentaries carefully right now.
>
> Busy day.
>   
Sorry you did not have time to read my commentaries carefully before 
responding yet again from a position of ignorance. 
> But, do you really  think Paul Johnson has "Revealed the Masters"?
>
> Revealed their personal identities??? Understood something of  their 
> teachings?
>   
In a word, yes.  When you read the book, you may understand the context 
in which my answer is given, but as one who judges a book by its cover, 
and offers a condemnation of said book based solely on the title, you 
are not one with whom I see much hope for meaningful discussions.
> According to the Esoteric Philosophy, it takes an Adept to
> fully understand Adepts.  And those who undertand anything serious sbout 
> them, do NOT "reveal". Have heard about Secrets of Initiation?
>   
> Tao Te King:  "Those who talk, don't know; those who know, don't talk".
>   

I can only ask you to look back over the past few weeks and take note of 
how much "talking" you have done  on theos-talk.  You came here with an 
agenda to undermine Daniel Caldwell and you have been using Caldwell's 
tactics to achieve your goal.  The implication that you somehow know 
more about the esoteric philosophy and what it really means is 
flapdoodle.   Paul Johnson and others whom you might call naive have 
studied and  synthesized more science, religion and philosophy than you 
even imagine.   The constant theme of your  relentless "talking" is 
evidence that you have not even studied your Self/self enough to 
recognize that  you are a self-centered mass of relationships, 
attachments, and addictions.  You behave in the manner we have come to 
expect from Caldwell.  The two of you are peas from the same pod.  
Meditate on that.


peace,


bill