From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <ringding@online.de>
Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: Theos-World HPB Declared Innocent by SPR
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:22:25 +0100
Dear Carlos,
your quarrel makes me laughter as you are playing
on words.
Daniel is quite right, when he writes that the SPR
did not declared innocent in 1986.
Harrison did not proof that the Mahatma Letters
are genuine and the Masters exists, he did only
proof that Hodgson's charges were not profen.
Don't you see the difference between "guilty" and
"not profen"?
Where does Harrison proof in his book that the
Mahatma Letters were written by KH and M.?
I think, nowhere. All he proofs is that HPB did
not write them.
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: "carlosaveline cardoso aveline"
<carlosaveline@hotmail.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:48 PM
Subject: Theos-World HPB Declared Innocent by SPR
Daniel,
I will note that in your opinion the SPR did not
have any charges against
HPB.
And that the SPR did not declare HPB innocent in
1986.
A surprising view indeed. I must recommend you
and everyone to read
Vernon Harrison's book on the subject. It seems
you did not yet.
And also Sylvia Cranston's biography of HPB, which
discusses the subject.
Very important books indeed, from which every
sincere student can benefit.
Regards, Carlos.
>From: "danielhcaldwell"
><danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Theos-World Re: HPB Declared Innocent
>Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:52:28 -0000
>
>Carlos wrote:
>
>"If the SPR revised and abandoned all its charges
>against HPB, this is tantamount to declare her
>inocent."
>
>Unless Carlos has information I'm not aware of,
>the SPR
>did NOT revise and abandon all its charges
>against
>HPB.
>
>Technically speaking , the SPR as
>a society did NOT have any charges against HPB in
>the
>first place. The charges against HPB were made
>by
>Hodgson and a committee of SPR members.
>
>But see also Leslie Price's relevant comments at:
>
>http://blavatskyfoundation.org/obitpric.htm
>
>But it was certainly significant that in 1986 the
>SPR
>journal published Harrison's report.
>
>Walter Carrither's book and Harrison's book
>certainly
>call into question many of the major charges made
>against
>HPB by Hodgson.
>
>But each reader, student, interested inquirer
>will have to decide
>for himself (herself) the validity of Hodgson's
>original charges
>and the rebuttals by Carrithers, Harrison and
>other defenders of
>HPB.
>
>Some of my own thinking on the matter can be
>found at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/mahatmasapparitions.htm
>
>especially in Footnote 1 at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/mahatmasapparitions.htm#1
>
>For example, interested readers should compare
>and contrast
>Henry Olcott's testimony about his encounters
>with the Masters
>at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/olcottandmahatmas.htm
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/olcottaccounts.htm
>
>with the testimony of Coulomb and Hodgson at:
>
>http://blavatskyarchives.com/coulombandhodgson.htm
>
>I would think that the perceptive reader of this
>material might
>see some glaring differences.....
>
>Daniel
>http://hpb.cc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Facilite sua vida: Use o Windows Desktop Search e
encontre qualquer arquivo
ou e-mail em seu PC. Acesse:
http://desktop.msn.com.br
Yahoo! Groups Links
theos-talk-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
_________________________________________________________________