Theos-Talk Archives (December 2005 Message tt00263)

Anand wrote
"Why would I live with somebody who eats flesh,
smokes to name a few habits."

I myself am a vegetarian since i was born

but the question is

'why would anand believe in a pedophile, a patological liar with a big
megalomaniac ego? ' (CWL)

if the masters thought that HPB was their best 'instrument' who are
you to dictate de contrary?

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell"
<danielhcaldwell@y...> wrote:
>
> Writing about Madame Blavatsky, Anand comments:
> 
> "...she was a chain smoker. Other things are too
> horrible to tell."
> 
> TOO HORRIBLE .....
> 
> Again pointing to Madame Blavatsky, Anand
> comments:
> 
> "Why would I live with somebody who eats flesh,
> smokes to name a few habits."
> 
> But apparently Master Koot Hoomi was NOT
> so "put off" by Madame Blavatsky.
> 
> Even C.W. Leadbeater writes about "the exceedingly
> close relation in which she [Blavatsky]
> stood with Him [Koot Hoomi] , so that whatever
> was within her consciousness was
> also within His when He wished it."
> 
> Yet apparently Anand would not want to be
> even in the same room with Madame Blavatsky....
> 
> Anand has professed reverence to the Masters
> yet "denigrates" Madame Blavatsky.
> 
> I guess Anand has forgotten what he wrote not
> long ago on this forum. Anand stated:
> 
> "Disciples and Master are one to considerable extent.
> Anything you do to a disciple is indirectly doing to
> the Master himself."
> 
> If this is true, and Anand has "denigrated" Blavatsky,
> has he also done so to the Master?
> 
> Food for thought.
> 
> Daniel
>