Anand: "Anything you do to a disciple is indirectly doing to the Master himself.
Dec 22, 2005 05:06 AM
by danielhcaldwell
Writing about Madame Blavatsky, Anand comments:
"...she was a chain smoker. Other things are too
horrible to tell."
TOO HORRIBLE .....
Again pointing to Madame Blavatsky, Anand
comments:
"Why would I live with somebody who eats flesh,
smokes to name a few habits."
But apparently Master Koot Hoomi was NOT
so "put off" by Madame Blavatsky.
Even C.W. Leadbeater writes about "the exceedingly
close relation in which she [Blavatsky]
stood with Him [Koot Hoomi] , so that whatever
was within her consciousness was
also within His when He wished it."
Yet apparently Anand would not want to be
even in the same room with Madame Blavatsky....
Anand has professed reverence to the Masters
yet "denigrates" Madame Blavatsky.
I guess Anand has forgotten what he wrote not
long ago on this forum. Anand stated:
"Disciples and Master are one to considerable extent.
Anything you do to a disciple is indirectly doing to
the Master himself."
If this is true, and Anand has "denigrated" Blavatsky,
has he also done so to the Master?
Food for thought.
Daniel
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
