Theos-Talk Archives (August 2005 Message tt00292)

Dallas and Odin,
Great news. 

Have I got this right, the Master's wrote,

that undulations and disturbances in the photosphere, the growing of the
"protuberances," and a fierce raging of elements in combustion have
been observed in the sun, with their tongues of fire and spots
exhibiting every appearance of cyclonic motion, and "solar storms,"
etc., etc.; to this the only answer that can be given is the
following: the appearances are all there, yet it is not combustion but 

If the "Adepts" are asked: "What then, in your views, is the nature of
our sun and what is there beyond that cosmic veil?"-they answer:
beyond rotates and beats the heart and head of our system; externally
is spread its robe, the nature of which is not matter, whether solid,
liquid, or gaseous, such as you are acquainted with, but vital
electricity, condensed and made visible.

So if the Sun is not in combustion, but is vital electricity, the nature of this vital electricity (magnetism) is a non-combustible force, although outwardly appearing as a combustible force? Without being able to explain the spirit of every element, because these elements will be forever hidden from scientific evaluation, is science doomed to be only ever to state what the sun is not? 
Cass


Cass: Are the Masters referring to sun spots and the proceeding magnetic solar storm which effects the magnetism between Earth and Sun and is causing the global weather changes? Although the sun is not in combustion as science once thought, is its nature and composition,

"W.Dallas TenBroeck" <dalval14@earthlink.net> wrote:
8/26/2005 3:46 AM

Thanks Odin:

RE: Science now confirms SD assertion 
Sun is not in combustion

Very interesting

Also the progression of flames as a magnetic/electrical event.


[ SUN in SECRET DOCTRINE I 87, 102, 149, 484fn, 528, 541, 591,

[ FLAME in S D I 6, 69-70, 81-2, 85fn, 87, 114, 121, 141-2, 216, 237,
250, 253, 265, 340-1, 447, 458fn, 521, 
II 79, 105, 109, 113, 232, 234, 247-8, 267, 593, 

[ ELECTRICITY S D I 81-2, 338, II 311fn

Best wishes,

Dallas

========================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Odin [mailto:otownley@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 5:36 AM
To: Reed; Jerome Wheeler
Subject: Science now confirms SD assertion Sun is not in combustion


MAGNETIC FLAMES' IN MOLECULAR MAGNETS EXHIBIT PROPERTIES AKIN TO FIRE,

August 23, 2005

In a groundbreaking experiment, researchers from The City College of
New York (CCNY) and Lehman College have measured the speed of magnetic
avalanches and discovered that the process is analogous to the flame
front of a flammable substance. The discovery of a "magnetic flame"
could make it easier for engineers to study the dynamics of fire.

Full story at http://www.physorg.com/news5967.html

================================================

H.P. Blavatsky, IS THE SUN MERELY A COOLING MASS?

Collected Writings VOLUME V
Sept., Oct., Nov., 1883

=================================

ODIN Is this not THEOSOPHIST for 1883 ?


The "Adepts," who are thus forced to demolish before they can
reconstruct, deny most emphatically (a) that the Sun is in combustion,
in any ordinary sense of the word; or (b) that he is incandescent or
even burning though he is glowing; or (c) that his luminosity has
already begun to weaken and his power of combustion may be exhausted
within a given and conceivable time; or even (d) that his chemical and
physical constitution contains any of the elements of terrestrial
chemistry in any of the states that either chemist or physicist is
acquainted with.

With reference to the latter, they add that, properly speaking, though
the body of the Sun,-a body that was never yet reflected by telescope
or spectroscope that man invented-cannot be said to be constituted of
those terrestrial elements with the state of which the chemist is
familiar, yet that these elements are all present in the sun's outward
robes, and a host more of elements unknown so far to science. There
seems little need, indeed, to have waited so long for the lines
belonging to these respective elements to correspond with dark lines
of the solar spectrum to know that no element present on our earth
could ever be possibly found wanting in the sun; although, on the
other hand, there are many others in the sun which have either not
reached or not as yet been discovered on our globe.

Some may be missing in certain stars and heavenly bodies still in the
process of formation; or, properly speaking, though present in them,
these elements on account of their undeveloped state may not respond
as yet to the usual scientific tests. But how can the earth possess
that which the Sun has never had?

The "Adepts" affirm as a fact that the true Sun,-an invisible orb of
which the known one is the shell, mask, or clothing-has in him the
spirit of every element that exists in the solar system; and his
"Chromosphere," as Mr. Lockyer named it, has the same, only in a far
more developed condition though still in a state unknown on earth; our
planet having to await its further growth and development before any
of its elements can be reduced to the condition they are in within
that chromosphere. Nor can the substance producing the coloured light
in the latter be properly called solid, liquid, or even "gaseous," as
now supposed, for it is neither.

If the "Adepts" are asked: "What then, in your views, is the nature of
our sun and what is there beyond that cosmic veil?"-they answer:
beyond rotates and beats the heart and head of our system; externally
is spread its robe, the nature of which is not matter, whether solid,
liquid, or gaseous, such as you are acquainted with, but vital
electricity, condensed and made visible. And if the statement is
objected to on the grounds that were the luminosity of the sun due to
any other cause than combustion and flame, no physical law of which
Western Science has any knowledge, could account for the existence of
such intensely high temperature of the sun without combustion;

...that such a temperature, besides burning with its light and flame
every visible thing in our universe, would show its luminosity of a
homogeneous and uniform intensity throughout, which it does not; that
undulations and disturbances in the photosphere, the growing of the
"protuberances," and a fierce raging of elements in combustion have
been observed in the sun, with their tongues of fire and spots
exhibiting every appearance of cyclonic motion, and "solar storms,"
etc., etc.; to this the only answer that can be given is the
following: the appearances are all there, yet it is not combustion.

Undoubtedly were the "robes," the dazzling drapery which now envelopes
the whole of the sun's globe withdrawn, or even "the shining
atmosphere which permits us to see the sun" (as Sir William Herschel
thought) removed so as to allow one trifling rent-our whole universe
would be reduced to ashes.

-----------




Yahoo! Groups Links








---------------------------------
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]