Theos-Talk Archives (August 2005 Message tt00153)

I understand the mechanics behind it (simply put, if you do something
wrong with your power, you get it revoked).

But what I don't understand is, what classifies as abusive?
o Showing off? (Say, showing your girlfriend and boss that you are telepathic)
o Continuous practice? (With the intent of furthering your own abilities)
o Neglecting other activities to practice? (Such as what I should be
doing, like reading the rest of the SD and finishing my commissions
work)

And would a master know of these transgressions?

Purely hypothetical questions.

-Mark H.

On 8/17/05, MKR <ramadoss@gbronline.com> wrote:
> I recall a statement somewhere in Mahatma Letters that a Chela is not a
> "Free Man (Woman)" so that there is always a safeguard built-in. I suppose
> there is a mechanism to monitor the actions of the Chela (because Master
> bears responsibility for the actions of the Chela) and it is quite possible
> that when an occult power is revoked the Chela simply loses the knowledge
> how to exercise the power. All we can do is to speculate unless there is
> someone on the list who can speak from first hand knowledge.
> 
> mkr
> 
> At 11:36 AM 08/17/05 -0400, Mark Hamilton Jr. wrote:
> >Very insightful article. I was always wondering how the Masters had
> >the ability to revoke certain occult power from their chelas.
> >
> >-Mark H.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date: 08/15/05
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Mark Hamilton Jr.
waking.adept@gmail.com