Theos-Talk Archives (July 2005 Message tt00132)

Konstantin,

You write:

"It seems that most of your evidences are based on the words of one
man, G. Tillet, exactly as a report against HPB was based on the 
words of one man, Hodgeson. And now most of the world takes it for a 
face value."

What are you suggesting here? That Gregory Tillett has somehow 
distorted or "faked" these evidences/records??

If you are suggesting this, consider the following:

In the 23 years since THE ELDER BROTHER by Tillett was published, no 
one has shown that Tillett has distorted or faked any of the records 
we have been discussing. 

These records are available and copies of them can be obtained from 
the proper officials. 

If you are serious in your above statement, then you should 
investigate this [Step 3 in the 4 step process] and obtain copies of 
these documents that would either verify or falsify your speculative 
claim.

If you find that Tillett has faked or distorted these documents, you 
could make quite a name for yourself, at least in Theosophical 
circles, by publishing your finding in THEOSOPHICAL HISTORY and/or 
THE THEOSOPHIST. You could even send the evidence to Dr. Tillett's 
University and "expose" him. 

But as far as I know, all documents are genuine and Tillett has done 
nothing but discover them and make the facts known.

You comment:

"Modern technology enables to prepare any 'facsimile'."

What are you suggesting here? That the documents should be produced 
in facsimile and published? Or that with modern technology supposed
"facsimiles" could be doctored?

You also write:

"Browsing through the internet I've found that mr Tillet made a good
business exposing Leadbeater."

What are you suggesting here? That Dr. Tillett has made money or 
fame in this "good business of exposing Leadbeater" and therefore we 
should suspect base motives on his part? Just what are you getting 
at? "Exposing Leadbeater"? Or has Tillett only been searching for 
the truth about Mr. Leadbeater and trying to set the record straight?

You also comment:

"Note that when this source shall be exhausted, he probably may 
proceed to HPB ;)"

So? Let him proceed to HPB. Good for him. What are you suggesting 
by this comment? 

I view your remarks as "ad hominem" in nature and am somewhat 
surprised that you would even write them. 

Daniel
http://hpb.cc