Theos-Talk Archives (July 2005 Message tt00130)

Thursday, July 14, 2005, 8:38:14 PM, Konstantin wrote:

> It seems that most of your evidences are based on the words of one
> man, G. Tillet

Even if it were so, wouldn't it be a more sound basis for a theory
than a mere speculation (which you even present as a speculation from
the very beginning) supported by no man at all?


> Yet some theories seem to me not very probable, for
> they imply that there was almost no logic in Leadbeater actions. If he
> was really so naive to lie when there are documents exposing him, it
> crushes other theories which ascribe to him some sophisticated and 
> vicious plots. If he really was a designing man, he should take 
> trouble to destroy the documents, and he could easily do that, for he
> was a clergyman and could invent some plausible means to penetrate 
> into the archives of the church where he was registered.

Why should there be any logic in his actions? Is it really
indispensable or unavoidable? And who talks about any sophisticated
vicious plots?

Maybe he was just a tender man with easy speech and wild imagination
caring very little of utterances not immediately refutable...