Theos-Talk Archives (July 2005 Message tt00124)

"Yet some theories seem to me not very probable, for
they imply that there was almost no logic in Leadbeater actions. If he
was really so naive to lie when there are documents exposing him, it
crushes other theories which ascribe to him some sophisticated and
vicious plots"
very well said =)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Konstantin Zaitzev"
<kay_ziatz@y...> wrote:
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "sova7777" <forums@s...> wrote:
> 
> > Correct. But this conclusion is based on pretty hard evidence that 
> has been shown.
> 
> Not hard, but SOFT, for we have only an eletronic text, not a paper 
> document.
> 
> >> The fact, if it is a fact at all, gives space for several 
> theories.
> 
> > Now, what is the evidence supporting those theories?
> 
> I admit that there are no evidences, exactly as there are no such 
> evidences for other theories; for all they are purely speculative, not 
> this one only. Yet some theories seem to me not very probable, for 
> they imply that there was almost no logic in Leadbeater actions. If he 
> was really so naive to lie when there are documents exposing him, it 
> crushes other theories which ascribe to him some sophisticated and 
> vicious plots. If he really was a designing man, he should take 
> trouble to destroy the documents, and he could easily do that, for he 
> was a clergyman and could invent some plausible means to penetrate 
> into the archives of the church where he was registered.